A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests

被引:469
作者
Wu, Dazhong [1 ]
Jennings, Connor [1 ]
Terpenny, Janis [1 ]
Gao, Robert X. [2 ]
Kumara, Soundar [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, Natl Sci Fdn, Ctr E Design, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2017年 / 139卷 / 07期
关键词
tool wear prediction; predictive modeling; machine learning; random forests (RFs); support vector machines (SVMs); artificial neural networks (ANNs); prognostics and health management (PHM); ARTIFICIAL-NEURAL-NETWORKS; REMAINING USEFUL LIFE; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; FLANK WEAR; MODEL; MAINTENANCE; REGRESSION; ONLINE; PROGRESSION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1115/1.4036350
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Manufacturers have faced an increasing need for the development of predictive models that predict mechanical failures and the remaining useful life (RUL) of manufacturing systems or components. Classical model-based or physics-based prognostics often require an in-depth physical understanding of the system of interest to develop closed-form mathematical models. However, prior knowledge of system behavior is not always available, especially for complex manufacturing systems and processes. To complement model-based prognostics, data-driven methods have been increasingly applied to machinery prognostics and maintenance management, transforming legacy manufacturing systems into smart manufacturing systems with artificial intelligence. While previous research has demonstrated the effectiveness of data-driven methods, most of these prognostic methods are based on classical machine learning techniques, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs) and support vector regression (SVR). With the rapid advancement in artificial intelligence, various machine learning algorithms have been developed and widely applied in many engineering fields. The objective of this research is to introduce a random forests (RFs)-based prognostic method for tool wear prediction as well as compare the performance of RFs with feed-forward back propagation (FFBP) ANNs and SVR. Specifically, the performance of FFBP ANNs, SVR, and RFs are compared using an experimental data collected from 315 milling tests. Experimental results have shown that RFs can generate more accurate predictions than FFBP ANNs with a single hidden layer and SVR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 2012 IEEE C PROGN, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICPHM.2012.6299526
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LARGE AREA SYNTHESIS, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.EPSL.2009.07.027, DOI 10.13031/2013.27171]
[3]   Machine Learning Based Predictive Modeling of Machining Induced Microhardness and Grain Size in Ti-6Al-4V Alloy [J].
Arisoy, Yigit M. ;
Ozel, Tugrul .
MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2015, 30 (04) :425-433
[4]   Health assessment and life prediction of cutting tools based on support vector regression [J].
Benkedjouh, T. ;
Medjaher, K. ;
Zerhouni, N. ;
Rechak, S. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2015, 26 (02) :213-223
[5]   The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection [J].
Bevilacqua, M ;
Braglia, M .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, 70 (01) :71-83
[6]  
Biau G, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P1063
[7]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[8]   ANALYSIS OF SENSOR SIGNALS SHOWS TURNING ON A LATHE EXHIBITS LOW-DIMENSIONAL CHAOS [J].
BUKKAPATNAM, STS ;
LAKHTAKIA, A ;
KUMARA, SRT .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 1995, 52 (03) :2375-2387
[9]   Analysis of acoustic emission signals in machining [J].
Bukkapatnam, STS ;
Kumara, SRT ;
Lakhtakia, A .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (04) :568-576
[10]   Fractal estimation of flank wear in turning [J].
Bukkapatnam, STS ;
Kumara, SRT ;
Lakhtakia, A .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2000, 122 (01) :89-94