A guide to using the internet to monitor and quantify the wildlife trade

被引:58
|
作者
Stringham, Oliver C. [1 ,2 ]
Toomes, Adam [1 ]
Kanishka, Aurelie M. [1 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Lewis [2 ]
Heinrich, Sarah [1 ]
Ross, Joshua V. [2 ]
Cassey, Phillip [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Invas Sci & Wildlife Ecol Lab, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Math Sci, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
big data; dark web; deep web; e‐ commerce; pet trade; social media; surface web; web scraping; comercio en lí nea; macrodatos; mercado de mascotas; redes sociales; web oscura; web profunda; web superficial; GLOBAL TRADE; MARKETS; RELEASE; ETHICS; EXTENT;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13675
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The unrivaled growth in e-commerce of animals and plants presents an unprecedented opportunity to monitor wildlife trade to inform conservation, biosecurity, and law enforcement. Using the internet to quantify the scale of the wildlife trade (volume and frequency) is a relatively recent and rapidly developing approach that lacks an accessible framework for locating relevant websites and collecting data. We produced an accessible guide for internet-based wildlife trade surveillance. We detailed a repeatable method involving a systematic internet search, with search engines, to locate relevant websites and content. For data collection, we highlight web-scraping technology as an efficient way to collect data in an automated fashion at regularly timed intervals. Our guide is applicable to the multitude of trade-based contexts because researchers can tailor search keywords for specific taxa or derived products and locations of interest. We provide information for working with the diversity of websites used in wildlife trade. For example, to locate relevant content on social media (e.g., posts or groups), each social media platform should be examined individually via the site's internal search engine. A key advantage of using the internet to study wildlife trade is the relative ease of access to an increasing amount of trade-related data. However, not all wildlife trade occurs online and it may occur on unobservable sections of the internet.
引用
收藏
页码:1130 / 1139
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An efficient data collection using wireless sensor networks and internet of things to monitor the wild animals in the reserved area
    Karunanithy, Kalaivanan
    Velusamy, Bhanumathi
    PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 15 (02) : 1105 - 1125
  • [42] Domesticating the Exotic? An Online Survey of Attitudes towards the International Wildlife Pet Trade
    Contina, Andrea
    Anderson, Christopher E.
    Hille, David C.
    Oakley, William F.
    Bridge, Eli S.
    Kelly, Jeffrey F.
    Smith, Haley O.
    Koch, Jennifer
    Jervis, Lori L.
    CONSERVATION & SOCIETY, 2021, 19 (03) : 184 - 189
  • [43] Online illegal wildlife trade in Indonesia: strengthening the regulatory framework and law enforcement
    Padang, Krismanko
    Nuruliawati
    Afifah, Zahrah
    Andriansyah, Muhammad Irfan
    Putri, Andina Auria Dwi
    Hafizoh, Nur
    Hermawati, Irma
    Muktamarianti, Ade Indah
    Yulianti, Syaras
    Handayani, Niken Wuri
    Mardiah, Sofi
    ORYX, 2025,
  • [44] A conflict of visions: Ideas shaping wildlife trade policy toward African megafauna
    't Sas-Rolfes, Michael
    Gooden, Jennifer
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (05) : 2029 - 2045
  • [45] Thirty-six years of legal and illegal wildlife trade entering the USA
    Olsen, Maria Therese Bager
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Harfoot, Mike
    Tittensor, Derek P.
    Price, Becky
    Sinovas, Pablo
    Nowak, Katarzyna
    Sanders, Nathan J.
    Burgess, Neil D.
    ORYX, 2021, 55 (03) : 432 - 441
  • [46] Illegal Wildlife Trade in Traditional Markets, on Instagram and Facebook: Raptors as a Case Study
    Nijman, Vincent
    Ardiansyah, Ahmad
    Langgeng, Abdullah
    Hendrik, Rifqi
    Hedger, Katherine
    Foreman, Grace
    Morcatty, Thais Q.
    Siriwat, Penthai
    van Balen, S.
    Eaton, James A.
    Shepherd, Chris R.
    Gomez, Lalita
    Imron, Muhammad Ali
    Nekaris, K. A. I.
    BIRDS, 2022, 3 (01): : 99 - 116
  • [47] Exploring the international trade in African snakes not listed on CITES: highlighting the role of the internet and social media
    Jensen, Timm Juul
    Auliya, Mark
    Burgess, Neil David
    Aust, Patrick Welby
    Pertoldi, Cino
    Strand, Julie
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 28 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [48] Unveiling the patterns and trends in 40 years of global trade in CITES-listed wildlife
    Harfoot, Michael
    Glaser, Satu A. M.
    Tittensor, Derek P.
    Britten, Gregory L.
    McLardy, Claire
    Malsch, Kelly
    Burgess, Neil D.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 223 : 47 - 57
  • [49] Global wildlife trade and trafficking contribute to the world's nonhuman primate conservation crisis
    Garber, Paul A.
    Estrada, Alejandro
    Shanee, Sam
    Svensson, Magdalena S.
    Arregoitia, Luis Verde
    Nijman, Vincent
    Shanee, Noga
    Gouveia, Sidney F.
    Nekaris, K. A. I.
    Chaudhary, Abhishek
    Bicca-Marques, Julio Cesar
    Hansen, Malene Fris
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2024, 5
  • [50] Identifying opportunities for expert-mediated triangulation in monitoring wildlife trade on social media
    Davies, Alisa
    Hinsley, Amy
    Nuno, Ana
    Martin, Rowan O.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (02)