Ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty: a review

被引:13
作者
Arnalich-Montiel, F. [1 ]
Dart, J. K. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Moorfields Eye Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Corneal & External Dis Serv, London, England
[2] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, Dept Pathol, London, England
关键词
ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty; review; indications; techniques; outcomes; ENDOTHELIAL-CELL LOSS; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; GRAFT FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; CORNEAL; AUTOGRAFTS; REJECTION;
D O I
10.1038/eye.2008.386
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Corneal opacity is a major cause of monocular blindness and, after cataract, is also a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Keratoplasty techniques for the treatment of corneal opacities include deep anterior lamellar allokeratoplasty, penetrating allokeratoplasty, penetrating bilateral autokeratoplasty, and ipsilateral rotational autokeratoplasty (IRA). This review describes the indications, technique, and outcomes of IRA. IRA is only indicated for patients with a localised opacity leaving a minimum diameter of 4-5mm of uninvolved clear cornea. For these few patients in whom the procedure is practicable, the surgery can be planned by manipulating digital images to estimate the trephine size and location and/or by the use of formulas. IRA may not provide either as good spectacle acuity or as good quality of vision as penetrating keratoplasty because of higher astigmatism and a reduced corneal pupillary clear zone, but these disadvantages are often outweighed when the risk of allograft rejection is high, as in paediatric patients and those with vascularised corneas. The main benefits of IRA are the retention of host endothelium, thereby eliminating both the risk of endothelial rejection and the prolonged attrition of endothelial cell numbers that occurs following penetrating keratoplasty, and the reduced requirement for postoperative steroid therapy with its associated complications. Eye (2009) 23, 1931-1938; doi:10.1038/eye.2008.386; published online 9 January 2009
引用
收藏
页码:1931 / 1938
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Optimal size and location for corneal rotational autografts - A simplified mathematical model [J].
Afshari, NA ;
Duncan, SM ;
Tanhehco, TY ;
Azar, DT .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 124 (03) :410-413
[2]   CLINICAL TYPES OF CORNEAL TRANSPLANT REJECTION - THEIR MANIFESTATIONS, FREQUENCY, PREOPERATIVE CORRELATES, AND TREATMENT [J].
ALLDREDGE, OC ;
KRACHMER, JH .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1981, 99 (04) :599-604
[3]   Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival [J].
Armitage, WJ ;
Dick, AD ;
Bourne, WM .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2003, 44 (08) :3326-3331
[4]   Outcome of rotational keratoplasty - Comparison of endothelial cell loss in autografts vs allografts [J].
Bertelmann, E ;
Hartmann, C ;
Scherer, M ;
Rieck, P .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 122 (10) :1437-1440
[5]  
BOURNE WM, 1978, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V85, P1312
[6]   Visual outcome in corneal grafts: a preliminary analysis of the Swedish Corneal Transplant Register [J].
Claesson, M ;
Armitage, WJ ;
Fagerholm, P ;
Stenevi, U .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 86 (02) :174-180
[7]  
DONSHIK PC, 1981, ANN OPHTHALMOL, V13, P29
[8]   Graft failure: III. Glaucoma escalation after penetrating keratoplasty [J].
Greenlee E.C. ;
Kwon Y.H. .
International Ophthalmology, 2008, 28 (3) :191-207
[9]  
GRODEN LR, 1983, ANN OPHTHALMOL, V15, P899
[10]   Centration of clear zone over the pupil is the best strategy for rotational autografts [J].
Harris, David J., Jr. .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 125 (07) :992-993