In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the US Pacific Northwest: The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood

被引:87
作者
Ribe, Robert G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] 5234 Univ Oregon, Inst Sustainable Environm, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
[2] 5234 Univ Oregon, Dept Landscape Architecture, Eugene, OR 97403 USA
关键词
Forest aesthetics; Ecological forestry; New forestry; Variable retention; Scenic standards; Pacific Northwest; Forest structure; Down wood; Woody debris; GREEN-TREE RETENTION; SOUTHERN PINE STANDS; LANDSCAPE PREFERENCE; VARYING LEVELS; PERCEPTIONS; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; ACCEPTABILITY; ALTERNATIVES; ASSESSMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.08.014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Tensions between amenity- and timber-based economies in the U.S. and Canadian Pacific Northwest motivated a study of scenic beauty inside mature forests and timber harvests. A diverse sample of regional forests, measures of forest structure, and large, representative samples of photographs and public judges were employed to measure scenic beauty inside un-harvested mature and old-growth forests, and timber harvests. The latter varied systematically in down wood levels and retention level and pattern. Scenic beauty tended to be optimized at a basal area of 110-155 m(3)/ha and/or 700-900 trees/ha. Older forests and those with larger trees were perceived to be more beautiful. In harvests, greater retention levels, less down wood, and dispersed rather than aggregated retention patterns contributed to aesthetic improvements. Green-tree retention harvests offer considerable potential gains in perceived scenic beauty compared to perceived very ugly clearcuts, particularly at higher retention levels. These gains are more reliable from dispersed retention patterns. The silvicultural parameters studied change strength in affecting scenic beauty with changes in retention level. These interactions are explored in relation to a range of scenic quality objectives as an aid to planners, visual impact analysts, and silviculturists. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 260
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Alho JM, 1997, FOREST SCI, V43, P521
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1976, RM167 USDA FOR SERV
[3]  
ARTHUR LM, 1977, FOREST SCI, V23, P151
[4]  
Aubry KB, 1999, NORTHWEST SCI, V73, P12
[5]  
Aubry Keith B., 2004, Forest Snow and Landscape Research, V78, P119
[6]  
BENSON RE, 1981, INT262 USDA FOR SERV
[7]  
Bliss JC, 2000, J FOREST, V98, P4
[8]  
BORMANN BT, 1994, PNW341 USDA FOR SERV
[9]  
BRADLEY GA, 2004, SILVICULTURAL OPTION, P63
[10]  
*BRIT COL MIN FOR, 2006, PUBL RESP HARV PRACT