In vivo rectal wall measurements during HDR prostate brachytherapy with MOSkin dosimeters integrated on a trans-rectal US probe: Comparison with planned and reconstructed doses

被引:33
|
作者
Carrara, Mauro [1 ,2 ]
Tenconi, Chiara [1 ]
Rossi, Giulio [1 ]
Borroni, Marta [1 ,2 ]
Cerrotta, Annamaria [2 ,3 ]
Grisotto, Simone [1 ]
Cusumano, Davide [1 ]
Pappalardi, Brigida [3 ]
Cutajar, Dean [4 ]
Petasecca, Marco [4 ]
Lerch, Michael [4 ]
Gambarini, Grazia [5 ]
Fallai, Carlo [2 ]
Rosenfeld, Anatoly [4 ]
Pignoli, Emanuele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Med Phys Unit, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Radiotherapy, Via Venezian 1, I-20133 Milan, Italy
[2] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Prostate Canc Program, Sci Directors Off, Milan, Italy
[3] Fdn IRCCS Ist Nazl Tumori, Radiat Oncol Unit 2, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Radiotherapy, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Wollongong, Ctr Med Radiat Phys, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[5] Natl Inst Nucl Phys INFN, Milan, Italy
关键词
In vivo dosimetry; HDR brachytherapy; Prostate; MOSFET; PLASTIC SCINTILLATION DETECTORS; CANCER; VERIFICATION; MONOTHERAPY; PHANTOM; ENERGY; ARRAY; AAPM;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To study if MOSkin detectors coupled to a trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) probe may be used for in vivo dosimetry on the rectal wall surface during US-based HDR prostate brachytherapy and to quantify possible discrepancies between planned and delivered doses. Materials and methods: MOSkins are a specific type of MOSFET dosimeter optimized to measure dose in steep dose gradients on interfaces. Two MOSkins were assembled on a TRUS probe used for on-line treatment planning. Measurements of the dose to the rectal wall were performed over 18 treatment sessions and compared to the doses calculated on the pre-treatment plan (D-PRE) and reconstructed on post-treatment images (D-POST) Results: Averages of the absolute differences between MOSkin readings and D-PRE, MOSkin readings and D-POST and D-PRE and D-POST were 6.7 +/- 5.1%, 3.6 +/- 1.9% and 6.3 +/- 4.7%, respectively. Agreement between measurements and D-POST was significantly better than between measurements and D-PRE (p = 0.002) and D-PRE and D-POST(p = 0.004). Discrepancy between D-POST and D-PRE correlated with the time required for treatment planning. Conclusion: MOSkin dosimeters integrated to the TRUS probe proved to be an accurate instrument for measuring the dose delivered to the rectal wall in HDR prostate brachytherapy. The delivered doses may differ significantly from those calculated in the treatment plan. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 153
页数:6
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Clinical application of MOSkin dosimeters to rectal wall in vivo dosimetry in gynecological HDR brachytherapy
    Carrara, M.
    Romanyukha, A.
    Tenconi, C.
    Mazzeo, D.
    Cerrotta, A.
    Borroni, M.
    Cutajar, D.
    Petasecca, M.
    Lerch, M.
    Bucci, J.
    Richetti, A.
    Presilla, S.
    Fallai, C.
    Gambarini, G.
    Pignoli, E.
    Rosenfeld, A.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 41 : 5 - 12
  • [2] TRUS-probe integrated MOSkin detectors for rectal wall in vivo dosimetry in HDR brachytherapy: In phantom feasibility study
    Tenconi, C.
    Carrara, M.
    Borroni, M.
    Cerrotta, A.
    Cutajar, D.
    Petasecca, M.
    Lerch, M.
    Bucci, J.
    Gambarini, G.
    Pignoli, E.
    Rosenfeld, A.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2014, 71 : 379 - 383
  • [3] Towards real time in-vivo rectal dosimetry during trans-rectal ultrasound based high dose rate prostate brachytherapy using MOSkin dosimeters
    Poder, Joel
    Howie, Andrew
    Brown, Ryan
    Bucci, Joseph
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly
    Enari, Komiti
    Schreiber, Kristine
    Carrara, Mauro
    Bece, Andrej
    Malouf, David
    Cutajar, Dean
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 151 : 273 - 279
  • [4] Study of the correlation between rectal wall in vivo dosimetry performed with MOSkins and implant modification during TRUS-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy
    Carrara, M.
    Tenconi, C.
    Mazzeo, D.
    Romanyukha, A.
    Borroni, M.
    Pignoli, E.
    Cutajar, D.
    Petasecca, M.
    Lerch, M.
    Bucci, J.
    Gambarini, G.
    Cerrotta, A.
    Fallai, C.
    Rosenfeld, A.
    RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2017, 106 : 385 - 390