Implementation evaluation of early intensive behavioral intervention programs for children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review of studies in the last decade

被引:24
作者
Caron, Valerie [1 ]
Berube, Annie [2 ]
Paquet, Annie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Dept Psychoeduc, 3351 Blvd Forges, Trois Rivieres, PQ G9A 5H7, Canada
[2] Univ Quebec Outaouais, Dept Psychoeduc, Pavillon Alexandre Tache,283 Blvd Alexandre Tache, Gatineau, PQ J9A 1L8, Canada
关键词
Early intensive behavioral intervention; Autism; Implementation science; Preschool child; COMPREHENSIVE TREATMENT MODELS; TREATMENT INTEGRITY; YOUNG-CHILDREN; OUTCOMES; PREVENTION; PRESCHOOL; EDUCATION; VALIDITY; SCIENCE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.01.004
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
For young children with autism spectrum disorders, one of the choice interventions is Early Intensive Behavioral Intervention. Over the past ten years, its effectiveness has been abundantly evaluated based on various parameters, including the intensity and duration of the intervention. Despite major advances in effectiveness evaluation, data concerning the implementation of the intervention are often described briefly, and the active ingredients of the intervention are but rarely linked to the documented effects. Objectives: This study aims at reviewing with a systematic method, the studies pertaining to EIBI provided to children with autism spectrum disorders over the past ten years (2005-2015) and at documenting the program implementation components described in the studies, based on Dane and Schneider's (1998) model in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results: The results show that, although the variables related to intervention dosage and protocol are relatively well described, the authors do not always consider them in the effects analysis. Furthermore, the majority of the studies did not report information on intervention participation, differentiation or quality. Conclusions: Data concerning the implementation of the intervention are partially described in the articles retained. In this regard, a better description of the intervention provided and a more systematic evaluation of its implementation seem necessary to detect the subtle differences in the effects of the intervention. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, PROJECT INITIATION D
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS
[3]   Quality of implementation of a school mental health initiative and changes over time in students' social and emotional competencies [J].
Askell-Williams, Helen ;
Dix, Katherine L. ;
Lawson, Michael J. ;
Slee, Phillip T. .
SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, 2013, 24 (03) :357-381
[4]   Concurrent validity of social subtype and IQ after early intensive behavioral intervention in children with autism: A preliminary investigation [J].
Beglinger, L ;
Smith, T .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2005, 35 (03) :295-303
[5]   The effects of intellectual functioning and autism severity on outcome of early behavioral intervention for children with autism [J].
Ben-Itzchak, Esther ;
Zachor, Ditza A. .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2007, 28 (03) :287-303
[6]  
Bérubé A, 2012, CAN J PROGRAM EVAL, V27, P93
[7]   Using implementation evaluation to uncover a child neglect prevention program [J].
Berube, Annie ;
Lafantaisie, Vicky ;
Dubeau, Diane ;
Coutu, Sylvain ;
Caron, Josee ;
Devault, Annie .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2014, 45 :1-8
[8]   Early intensive behavioral treatment: Replication of the UCLA model in a community setting [J].
Cohen, Howard ;
Amerine-Dickens, Mila ;
Smith, Tristram .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, 2006, 27 (02) :S145-S155
[9]   Evidence-Based Practices and Implementation Science in Special Education [J].
Cook, Bryan G. ;
Odom, Samuel L. .
EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2013, 79 (02) :135-+
[10]   Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control [J].
Dane, AV ;
Schneider, BH .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 18 (01) :23-45