The impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm animals

被引:73
作者
Rodenburg, T. Bas
Koene, Paul
机构
[1] Inst Agr & Fisheries Res, Anim Sci Unit, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Dept Anim Sci, Ethol Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
group size; aggression; fear; stress; feather pecking; tail biting;
D O I
10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.024
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The aim of this review is to discuss the impact of group size on damaging behaviours, aggression, fear and stress in farm animals and to identify housing- and management options that can help to reduce problems caused by suboptimal group sizes. Increasing group size was found to increase the risk of damaging behaviour, such as feather pecking in laying hens and vulva biting in sows. Aggression does not appear to be a problem in large groups, because dominance relationships in these groups are not based on individual recognition, but based on other signals such as body size, avoiding costly fights. There is evidence for increased fear and stress levels in large groups compared with small groups, but fearfulness is also strongly affected by type of housing. To minimise problems in large groups, is seems helpful to offer separate functional areas and to provide cover, reducing disturbance between animals. To minimise the risk of damaging behaviour, such as feather pecking in laying hens and tail biting in pigs, stimulating foraging, exploration and manipulation behaviour by providing sufficient substrate (straw, wood shavings and sand) offers perspective. Rearing the animals in a system which allows the development of all these behaviours is very important. Other solutions can be found in optimising the diet and offering extra foraging opportunities. Furthermore, genetic selection against damaging behaviour seems promising. In conclusion, group size mainly has an effect on damaging behaviour and fear and stress in pigs and poultry. The effect on aggressive behaviour is limited. To reduce damaging behaviour, fear and stress, it is important to provide a complex environment with ample behavioural opportunities and separate functional areas. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 214
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
ALBERS GAA, 2002, ARCH GEFLUGELKD, V66, P31
[2]   FEATHER PECKING AND CANNIBALISM IN A CAGED LAYER FLOCK [J].
ALLEN, J ;
PERRY, GC .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1975, 16 (05) :441-451
[3]   Aggression and group size in domesticated pigs, Sus scrofa:: 'when the winner takes it all and the loser is standing small' [J].
Andersen, IL ;
Nævdal, E ;
Bakken, M ;
Boe, KE .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2004, 68 :965-975
[4]  
BARNETT WS, 1986, EARLY CHILDHOOD RES, V1, P249
[5]  
BESBES B, 2002, ARCH GEFLUGELKD, V66, P52
[6]  
BESSEI W, 1984, ARCH GEFLUGELKD, V48, P231
[7]   Farm level factors associated with feather pecking in organic laying hens [J].
Bestman, MWP ;
Wagenaar, JP .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2003, 80 (1-2) :133-140
[8]  
Bilcík B, 2000, APPL ANIM BEHAV SCI, V68, P55, DOI 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00089-7
[9]   Effect of group size on tonic immobility in laying hens [J].
Bilcik, B ;
Keeling, LJ ;
Newberry, RC .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1998, 43 (01) :53-59
[10]   FEATHER-PECKING IN POULTRY - ITS RELATION WITH GROUND-PECKING [J].
BLOKHUIS, HJ .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1986, 16 (01) :63-67