The distance effect on discrimination ability and response bias during magnitude comparison in a go/no-go task

被引:3
作者
Hepdarcan, Ilgim [1 ]
Bulut, Merve [1 ]
Palaz, Ezgi [1 ]
Can, Seda [1 ]
Dural, Seda [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Univ Econ, Dept Psychol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Mental number line; Distance effect; Magnitude comparison; Signal detection theory; Go; no-go task;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-021-02274-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The distance effect is the change in the performance during numerical magnitude comparison, depending on the numerical distance between the compared numbers (Moyer & Landauer, Nature, 215[5109], 1519-1520, 1967). This effect is generally accepted as evidence for the mental number line (MNL) hypothesis, which proposes that the mental representation of the numbers align in an increasing linear (or monotone) order. The majority of studies investigating the distance effect are focused on the reaction time (RT) findings, which show slower responses for closer numbers. In the present study, we examined the distance effect by applying signal detection theory (SDT) to a magnitude comparison task. We aimed to reveal whether discrimination ability and the response bias measures were affected by the location of numbers on the MNL. To accomplish this, we developed a magnitude comparison task using a go/no-go procedure in which participants performed a magnitude comparison based on a reference number (i.e., 5). Results revealed a substantial distance effect in both sensitivity and response bias measures-a better discrimination performance for far numbers, and a larger response bias for close numbers. In addition, an RT distribution analysis revealed that the distance effect seems to originate mainly from slower responses. Based on the current data, we suggest that sensitivity and response bias measures could offer comprehensive information in the understanding of number-based decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:2052 / 2060
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   MENTAL COMPARISON AND SYMBOLIC DISTANCE EFFECT [J].
MOYER, RS ;
BAYER, RH .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 8 (02) :228-246
[22]   TIME REQUIRED FOR JUDGEMENTS OF NUMERICAL INEQUALITY [J].
MOYER, RS ;
LANDAUER, TK .
NATURE, 1967, 215 (5109) :1519-&
[23]   PERCEPTUAL COMPARISONS THROUGH MINDS EYE [J].
PAIVIO, A .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1975, 3 (06) :635-647
[24]   A RANDOM-WALK MODEL OF DIGIT COMPARISON [J].
POLTROCK, SE .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 33 (02) :131-162
[25]   GROUP REACTION-TIME DISTRIBUTIONS AND AN ANALYSIS OF DISTRIBUTION STATISTICS [J].
RATCLIFF, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (03) :446-461
[26]   The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks [J].
Ratcliff, Roger ;
McKoon, Gail .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 2008, 20 (04) :873-922
[27]   Exploring the origin of the number-size congruency effect: Sensitivity or response bias? [J].
Reike, Dennis ;
Schwarz, Wolf .
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2017, 79 (02) :383-388
[28]   The reliability of and the relation between non-symbolic numerical distance effects in comparison, same-different judgments and priming [J].
Sasanguie, Delphine ;
Defever, Emmy ;
Van den Bussche, Eva ;
Reynvoet, Bert .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2011, 136 (01) :73-80
[29]   Does the emotional go/no-go task really measure behavioral inhibition? Convergence with measures on a non-emotional analog [J].
Schulz, Kurt P. ;
Fan, Jin ;
Magidina, Olga ;
Marks, David J. ;
Hahn, Bella ;
Halperin, Jeffrey M. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 22 (02) :151-160
[30]   On the relative speed account of number-size interference in comparative judgments of numerals [J].
Schwarz, W ;
Ischebeck, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2003, 29 (03) :507-522