The distance effect on discrimination ability and response bias during magnitude comparison in a go/no-go task

被引:3
作者
Hepdarcan, Ilgim [1 ]
Bulut, Merve [1 ]
Palaz, Ezgi [1 ]
Can, Seda [1 ]
Dural, Seda [1 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Univ Econ, Dept Psychol, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Mental number line; Distance effect; Magnitude comparison; Signal detection theory; Go; no-go task;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-021-02274-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The distance effect is the change in the performance during numerical magnitude comparison, depending on the numerical distance between the compared numbers (Moyer & Landauer, Nature, 215[5109], 1519-1520, 1967). This effect is generally accepted as evidence for the mental number line (MNL) hypothesis, which proposes that the mental representation of the numbers align in an increasing linear (or monotone) order. The majority of studies investigating the distance effect are focused on the reaction time (RT) findings, which show slower responses for closer numbers. In the present study, we examined the distance effect by applying signal detection theory (SDT) to a magnitude comparison task. We aimed to reveal whether discrimination ability and the response bias measures were affected by the location of numbers on the MNL. To accomplish this, we developed a magnitude comparison task using a go/no-go procedure in which participants performed a magnitude comparison based on a reference number (i.e., 5). Results revealed a substantial distance effect in both sensitivity and response bias measures-a better discrimination performance for far numbers, and a larger response bias for close numbers. In addition, an RT distribution analysis revealed that the distance effect seems to originate mainly from slower responses. Based on the current data, we suggest that sensitivity and response bias measures could offer comprehensive information in the understanding of number-based decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:2052 / 2060
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction [J].
Ansorge, U .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2003, 10 (03) :363-383
[2]   The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability [J].
Brown, GS ;
White, KG .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2005, 37 (03) :436-449
[3]   COMPARISONS OF DIGITS AND DOT PATTERNS [J].
BUCKLEY, PB ;
GILLMAN, CB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 103 (06) :1131-1136
[4]   Mental representations of social status [J].
Chiao, JY ;
Bordeaux, AR ;
Ambady, N .
COGNITION, 2004, 93 (02) :B49-B57
[5]   IS NUMERICAL COMPARISON DIGITAL - ANALOGICAL AND SYMBOLIC EFFECTS IN 2-DIGIT NUMBER COMPARISON [J].
DEHAENE, S ;
DUPOUX, E ;
MEHLER, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (03) :626-641
[6]  
Dehaene S., 1997, ADULTS NUMBER LINE N, P64
[7]   Irritability uniquely predicts prefrontal cortex activation during preschool inhibitory control among all temperament domains: A LASSO approach [J].
Fishburn, Frank A. ;
Hlutkowsky, Christina O. ;
Bemis, Lisa M. ;
Huppert, Theodore J. ;
Wakschlag, Lauren S. ;
Perlman, Susan B. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2019, 184 :68-77
[8]   Size before numbers: Conceptual size primes numerical value [J].
Gabay, Shai ;
Leibovich, Tali ;
Henik, Avishai ;
Gronau, Nurit .
COGNITION, 2013, 129 (01) :18-23
[9]   Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect [J].
Gevers, W ;
Verguts, T ;
Reynvoet, B ;
Caessens, B ;
Fias, W .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2006, 32 (01) :32-44
[10]   The numerical distance effect is task dependent [J].
Goldfarb, Liat ;
Henik, Avishai ;
Rubinsten, Orly ;
Bloch-David, Yafit ;
Gertner, Limor .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2011, 39 (08) :1508-1517