Retrograde Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones Larger Than 2.5 cm

被引:114
作者
Riley, Julie M. [1 ]
Stearman, Laura [1 ]
Troxel, Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Urol, Columbia, MO 65212 USA
关键词
SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; LASER LITHOTRIPSY; CALCULI; GREATER; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1089/end.2009.0391
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction and Objectives: Because of the advances in endoscopic technology, retrograde flexible ureteroscopy (URS) is being applied to larger renal stone burdens. For stones greater than 2.5 cm, percutaneous nephrolithotomy has long been considered the standard of care. We have encountered a growing population of patients who desire a less invasive, less disruptive approach to large renal stones. We present our experience with retrograde ureteroscopic management of renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. Methods: Twenty-two patients between October 2004 and June 2008 underwent retrograde flexible URS with holmium laser lithotripsy. Each patient underwent retrograde URS using the Storz Flex-X and a ureteral access sheath. Patients were evaluated for number of procedures, stone clearance rates, and hospital admissions. Postoperative kidney, ureter, and bladder radiograph was used to determine stone-free rates. Results: Mean stone size was 3.0 cm. The average number of procedures was 1.82 with 5 patients requiring one, 14 requiring two, and 1 requiring three procedures. There were two failures who went on to have percutaneous nephrolithotomy, both of whom had significant lower pole stone burden. Overall stone-free rate was 90.9%. There were three overnight admissions for stent pain, and one 3-day admission for bacteremia in a patient who was noncompliant with preoperative antibiotics. Conclusions: Planned staged URS is a viable option for the treatment of renal stones larger than 2.5 cm with excellent stone-free results. Significant lower pole stone burden is a limiting factor.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1398
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater - Is this the new frontier? [J].
Breda, Alberto ;
Ogunyemi, Oreoluwa ;
Leppert, John T. ;
Lam, John S. ;
Schulam, Peter G. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (03) :981-984
[2]   Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for large renal calculi [J].
El-Anany, FG ;
Hammouda, HM ;
Maghraby, HA ;
Elakkad, MA .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (09) :850-853
[3]   Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: The impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy [J].
Elbahnasy, AM ;
Shalhav, AL ;
Hoenig, DM ;
Elashry, OM ;
Smith, DS ;
McDougall, EM ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (03) :676-682
[4]   Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm. or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi [J].
Grasso, M ;
Conlin, M ;
Bagley, D .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) :346-351
[5]  
Grasso M., 2001, COMPLICATIONS UROLOG, P268
[6]  
Gupta M, 2007, CAMBELLWALSH UROLOGY, P1544
[7]   Flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with in situ lithotripsy for lower pole calculi [J].
Hollenbeck, BK ;
Schuster, TG ;
Faerber, GJ ;
Wolf, JS .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :859-862
[8]   Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi [J].
L'Esperance, JO ;
Ekeruo, WO ;
Scales, CD ;
Marguet, CG ;
Springhart, WP ;
Maloney, ME ;
Albala, DM ;
Preminger, GM .
UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (02) :252-255
[9]  
Lingeman J., 2007, CAMBELL WALSH UROLOG, V9th, P1437
[10]   Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi [J].
Mariani, Albert J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) :168-173