Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification

被引:92
作者
Mendhiratta, Neil [1 ]
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [2 ]
Meng, Xiaosong [3 ]
Wysock, James S. [6 ]
Fenstermaker, Michael [1 ]
Huang, Richard [4 ]
Deng, Fang-Ming [5 ]
Melamed, Jonathan [5 ]
Zhou, Ming [5 ]
Huang, William C. [4 ]
Lepor, Herbert [4 ]
Taneja, Samir S. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[6] New York Hosp Queens, Dept Urol, Flushing, NY USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; biopsy; diagnostic imaging; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER DETECTION; GUIDED BIOPSY; STATISTICS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.078
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: MRF-TB (magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy) may improve the detection of prostate cancer in men presenting for prostate biopsy. We report clinical outcomes of 12-core systematic biopsy and MRF-TB in men who presented for primary biopsy and further describe pathological characteristics of cancers detected by systematic biopsy and not by MRF-TB. Materials and Methods: Clinical outcomes of 452 consecutive men who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by MRF-TB and systematic biopsy at our institution between June 2012 and June 2015 were captured in an institutional review board approved database. Clinical characteristics, biopsy results and magnetic resonance imaging suspicion scores were queried from the database. Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 207 of 382 men (54.2%) with a mean SD age of 64 +/- 8.5 years and mean +/- SEM prostate specific antigen 6.8 +/- 0.3 ng/ml who met study inclusion criteria. The cancer detection rate of systematic biopsy and MRF-TB was 49.2% and 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.006). MRF-TB detected more Gleason score 7 or greater cancers than systematic biopsy (117 of 132 or 88.6% vs 102 of 132 or 77.3%, p = 0.037). Of 41 cancers detected by systematic biopsy but not by MRF-TB 34 (82.9%) demonstrated Gleason 6 disease, and 26 (63.4%) and 34 (82.9%) were clinically insignificant by Epstein criteria and a UCSF CAPRA (University of California-San Francisco-Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score of 2 or less, respectively. Conclusions: In men presenting for primary prostate biopsy MRF-TB detects more high grade cancers than systematic biopsy. Most cancers detected by systematic biopsy and not by MRF-TB are at clinically low risk. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging followed by MRF-TB decreases the detection of low risk cancers while significantly improving the detection and risk stratification of high grade disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1606
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy-Are 2 Biopsy Cores per Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Required?
    Dimitroulis, Pantelis
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Nini, Alessandro
    Hiester, Andreas
    Esposito, Irene
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Antoch, Gerald
    Albers, Peter
    Arsov, Christian
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (05) : 1030 - 1034
  • [42] Defining Novel and Practical Metrics to Assess the Deliverables of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy
    Ristau, Benjamin T.
    Chen, David Y. T.
    Ellis, Jeffrey
    Malhotra, Aseem
    DeMora, Lyudmila
    Parsons, Rosaleen B.
    Milestone, Barton
    Brody, Marion
    Viterbo, Rosalia
    Greenberg, Richard
    Smaldone, Marc
    Uzzo, Robert
    Anaokar, Jordan
    Kutikov, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (04) : 969 - 975
  • [43] How Many Targeted Biopsy Cores are Needed for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection during Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy?
    Song, Gang
    Ruan, Mingjian
    Wang, He
    Fan, Yu
    He, Qun
    Lin, Zhiyong
    Li, Xueying
    Li, Peng
    Wang, Xiaoying
    He, Zhisong
    Zhou, Liqun
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (06) : 1202 - 1208
  • [44] Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy
    Hansen, Nienke L.
    Kesch, Claudia
    Barrett, Tristan
    Koo, Brendan
    Radtke, Jan P.
    Bonekamp, David
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Warren, Anne Y.
    Wieczorek, Kathrin
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Kastner, Christof
    Hadaschik, Boris
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 120 (05) : 631 - 638
  • [45] A Prospective, Blinded Comparison of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion and Visual Estimation in the Performance of MR-targeted Prostate Biopsy: The PROFUS Trial
    Wysock, James S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Huang, William C.
    Stifelman, Michael D.
    Lepor, Herbert
    Deng, Fang-Ming
    Melamed, Jonathan
    Taneja, Samir S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (02) : 343 - 351
  • [46] Comparisons between magnetic resonance/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy and standard biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer A prospective cohort study
    Zhu, Guangbin
    Wang, Quan
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (36)
  • [47] Learning curve for fusion magnetic resonance imaging targeted prostate biopsy and three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography segmentation
    Lenfant, Louis
    Beitone, Clement
    Troccaz, Jocelyne
    Roupret, Morgan
    Seisen, Thomas
    Voros, Sandrine
    Mozer, Pierre C.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 (06) : 709 - 716
  • [48] Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Targeted Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer
    Hoffmann, Manuela A.
    Taymoorian, Kasra
    Ruf, Christian
    Gerhards, Arnd
    Leyendecker, Karlheinz
    Stein, Thomas
    Jakobs, Frank M.
    Schreckenberger, Mathias
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (12) : 6871 - 6877
  • [49] Value of Targeted Prostate Biopsy Using Magnetic Resonance-Ultrasound Fusion in Men with Prior Negative Biopsy and Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen
    Sonn, Geoffrey A.
    Chang, Edward
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Margolis, Daniel J.
    Macairan, Malu
    Lieu, Patricia
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 65 (04) : 809 - 815
  • [50] Reasons for missing clinically significant prostate cancer by targeted magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy
    Klingebiel, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Quentin, M.
    Al-Monajjed, R.
    Mally, D.
    Sawicki, L. M.
    Hiester, A.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 137