Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification

被引:92
作者
Mendhiratta, Neil [1 ]
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [2 ]
Meng, Xiaosong [3 ]
Wysock, James S. [6 ]
Fenstermaker, Michael [1 ]
Huang, Richard [4 ]
Deng, Fang-Ming [5 ]
Melamed, Jonathan [5 ]
Zhou, Ming [5 ]
Huang, William C. [4 ]
Lepor, Herbert [4 ]
Taneja, Samir S. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[6] New York Hosp Queens, Dept Urol, Flushing, NY USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; biopsy; diagnostic imaging; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER DETECTION; GUIDED BIOPSY; STATISTICS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.078
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: MRF-TB (magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy) may improve the detection of prostate cancer in men presenting for prostate biopsy. We report clinical outcomes of 12-core systematic biopsy and MRF-TB in men who presented for primary biopsy and further describe pathological characteristics of cancers detected by systematic biopsy and not by MRF-TB. Materials and Methods: Clinical outcomes of 452 consecutive men who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by MRF-TB and systematic biopsy at our institution between June 2012 and June 2015 were captured in an institutional review board approved database. Clinical characteristics, biopsy results and magnetic resonance imaging suspicion scores were queried from the database. Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 207 of 382 men (54.2%) with a mean SD age of 64 +/- 8.5 years and mean +/- SEM prostate specific antigen 6.8 +/- 0.3 ng/ml who met study inclusion criteria. The cancer detection rate of systematic biopsy and MRF-TB was 49.2% and 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.006). MRF-TB detected more Gleason score 7 or greater cancers than systematic biopsy (117 of 132 or 88.6% vs 102 of 132 or 77.3%, p = 0.037). Of 41 cancers detected by systematic biopsy but not by MRF-TB 34 (82.9%) demonstrated Gleason 6 disease, and 26 (63.4%) and 34 (82.9%) were clinically insignificant by Epstein criteria and a UCSF CAPRA (University of California-San Francisco-Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score of 2 or less, respectively. Conclusions: In men presenting for primary prostate biopsy MRF-TB detects more high grade cancers than systematic biopsy. Most cancers detected by systematic biopsy and not by MRF-TB are at clinically low risk. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging followed by MRF-TB decreases the detection of low risk cancers while significantly improving the detection and risk stratification of high grade disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1606
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adding systematic biopsy to magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy of the prostate in men with previous negative biopsy or enrolled in active surveillance programs A prospective single center, randomized study
    Porreca, Angelo
    Del Giudice, Francesco
    Giampaoli, Marco
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Corsi, Paolo
    Del Rosso, Alessandro
    Maggi, Martina
    Chung, Benjamin, I
    Ferro, Matteo
    de Cobelli, Ottavio
    Lucarelli, Giuseppe
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    De Berardinis, Ettore
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    Busetto, Gian Maria
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (37) : E22059
  • [32] Critical Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted, Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Transperineal Fusion Biopsy for Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Kuru, Timur H.
    Roethke, Matthias C.
    Seidenader, Jonas
    Simpfendoerfer, Tobias
    Boxler, Silvan
    Alammar, Khalid
    Rieker, Philip
    Popeneciu, Valentin I.
    Roth, Wilfried
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (04) : 1380 - 1386
  • [33] Determination of Gleason score discrepancy for risk stratification in magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
    Kim, See Hyung
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2020, 61 (08) : 1134 - 1142
  • [34] PTEN and ERG detection in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy compared to systematic biopsy
    Baumgartner, Erin
    Pena, Maria del Carmen Rodriguez
    Eich, Marie-Lisa
    Porter, Kristin K.
    Nix, Jeffrey W.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Gordetsky, Jennifer
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 90 : 20 - 26
  • [35] Improving Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Salami, Simpa S.
    Yaskiv, Oksana
    George, Arvin K.
    Fakhoury, Mathew
    Beecher, Karin
    Vira, Manish A.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Siegel, David N.
    Villani, Robert
    Ben-Levi, Eran
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (06) : 1749 - 1754
  • [36] Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies
    Filson, Christopher P.
    Natarajan, Shyam
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    Huang, Jiaoti
    Lieu, Patricia
    Dorey, Frederick J.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) : 884 - 892
  • [37] Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection
    Haffner, Jeremie
    Lemaitre, Laurent
    Puech, Philippe
    Haber, Georges-Pascal
    Leroy, Xavier
    Jones, J. Stephen
    Villers, Arnauld
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (8B) : E171 - E178
  • [38] Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Targeted by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Cognitive Fusion
    Dragoescu, Petru Octavian
    Drocas, Andrei Ioan
    Dragoescu, Alice Nicoleta
    Padureanu, Vlad
    Panus, Andrei
    Stanculescu, Andreea Doriana
    Radu, Mihai Alexandru
    Florescu, Lucian Mihai
    Gheonea, Ioana Andreea
    Mirea, Cecil
    Mitroi, George
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (08)
  • [39] Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy
    Bloom, Jonathan B.
    Hale, Graham R.
    Gold, Samuel A.
    Rayn, Kareem N.
    Smith, Clayton
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Czarniecki, Marcin
    Valera, Vladimir
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Parnes, Howard L.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (01) : 84 - 90
  • [40] Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided In-bore Prostate Biopsy versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy Naive Men with Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen
    Quentin, Michael
    Blondin, Dirk
    Arsov, Christian
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Hiester, Andreas
    Godehardt, Erhard
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Rabenalt, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05) : 1374 - 1379