Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification

被引:92
|
作者
Mendhiratta, Neil [1 ]
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B. [2 ]
Meng, Xiaosong [3 ]
Wysock, James S. [6 ]
Fenstermaker, Michael [1 ]
Huang, Richard [4 ]
Deng, Fang-Ming [5 ]
Melamed, Jonathan [5 ]
Zhou, Ming [5 ]
Huang, William C. [4 ]
Lepor, Herbert [4 ]
Taneja, Samir S. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Sch Med, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[5] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[6] New York Hosp Queens, Dept Urol, Flushing, NY USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; ultrasonography; biopsy; diagnostic imaging; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CANCER DETECTION; GUIDED BIOPSY; STATISTICS; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.078
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: MRF-TB (magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy) may improve the detection of prostate cancer in men presenting for prostate biopsy. We report clinical outcomes of 12-core systematic biopsy and MRF-TB in men who presented for primary biopsy and further describe pathological characteristics of cancers detected by systematic biopsy and not by MRF-TB. Materials and Methods: Clinical outcomes of 452 consecutive men who underwent prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging followed by MRF-TB and systematic biopsy at our institution between June 2012 and June 2015 were captured in an institutional review board approved database. Clinical characteristics, biopsy results and magnetic resonance imaging suspicion scores were queried from the database. Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 207 of 382 men (54.2%) with a mean SD age of 64 +/- 8.5 years and mean +/- SEM prostate specific antigen 6.8 +/- 0.3 ng/ml who met study inclusion criteria. The cancer detection rate of systematic biopsy and MRF-TB was 49.2% and 43.5%, respectively (p = 0.006). MRF-TB detected more Gleason score 7 or greater cancers than systematic biopsy (117 of 132 or 88.6% vs 102 of 132 or 77.3%, p = 0.037). Of 41 cancers detected by systematic biopsy but not by MRF-TB 34 (82.9%) demonstrated Gleason 6 disease, and 26 (63.4%) and 34 (82.9%) were clinically insignificant by Epstein criteria and a UCSF CAPRA (University of California-San Francisco-Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score of 2 or less, respectively. Conclusions: In men presenting for primary prostate biopsy MRF-TB detects more high grade cancers than systematic biopsy. Most cancers detected by systematic biopsy and not by MRF-TB are at clinically low risk. Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging followed by MRF-TB decreases the detection of low risk cancers while significantly improving the detection and risk stratification of high grade disease.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1606
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic Accuracy and Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Targeted and Template Systematic Prostate Biopsy Based on Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Noh, Tae Il
    Tae, Jong Hyun
    Kim, Hyung Keun
    Shim, Ji Sung
    Kang, Sung Gu
    Sung, Deuk Jae
    Cheon, Jun
    Lee, Jeong Gu
    Kang, Seok Ho
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 52 (03): : 714 - 721
  • [22] Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus combined magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion and systematic biopsy for prostate cancer detection in routine clinical practice
    Bae, Jae Heung
    Kim, See Hyung
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2020, 39 (02) : 137 - 143
  • [23] Analyzing the learning curves of a novice and an experienced urologist for transrectal magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy
    Cata, Emanuel Darius
    Van Praet, Charles
    Andras, Iulia
    Kadula, Pierre
    Ognean, Razvan
    Buzoianu, Maximilian
    Leucuta, Daniel
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Tamas-Szora, Attila
    Decaestecker, Karel
    Coman, Ioan
    Crisan, Nicolae
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2021, 10 (05) : 1956 - 1965
  • [24] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy During Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance
    Tran, Geraldine N.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (02) : 275 - 281
  • [25] Is it worth carrying out ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted biopsy on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score 3 prostate lesions?
    Kim, Kyung Hwan
    Ku, Ja Yoon
    Park, Won Young
    Hong, Seung Baek
    Kim, Suk
    Ha, Hong Koo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) : 431 - 438
  • [26] Targeted Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer Using an Office Based Magnetic Resonance Ultrasound Fusion Device
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Choyke, Peter
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01) : 92 - 92
  • [27] Minimum Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Cores Needed for Prostate Cancer Detection: Multivariable Retrospective, Lesion Based Analyses of Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy
    Leyh-Bannurah, Sami-Ramzi
    Kachanov, Mykyta
    Beyersdorff, Dirk
    Tian, Zhe
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Tilki, Derya
    Fisch, Margit
    Maurer, Tobias
    Graefen, Markus
    Budaeus, Lars
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 (02) : 299 - 303
  • [28] Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Diagnostic Accuracy from a Single Center Retrospective Study
    Fulco, Andrea
    Chiaradia, Francesco
    Ascalone, Luigi
    Andracchio, Vincenzo
    Greco, Antonio
    Cappa, Manlio
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Ludovico, Giuseppe Mario
    Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
    Palmieri, Camillo
    Alba, Stefano
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [29] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes
    Kongnyuy, Michael
    George, Arvin K.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
    Pinto, Peter A.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 17 (04) : 1 - 9
  • [30] Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy: Review of Technology, Techniques, and Outcomes
    Michael Kongnyuy
    Arvin K. George
    Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
    Peter A. Pinto
    Current Urology Reports, 2016, 17