Readability of Spine-Related Patient Education Materials From Subspecialty Organization and Spine Practitioner Websites

被引:75
作者
Vives, Michael [1 ]
Young, Lyle [1 ]
Sabharwal, Sanjeev [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Sch Med, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
关键词
patient education; readability; spinal disorders; spine websites; HEALTH LITERACY; INFORMED-CONSENT; READING-ABILITY; DECISION AIDS; INTERNET; QUALITY; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b4bb0c
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Analysis of spine-related websites available to the general public. Objective. To assess the readability of spine-related patient educational materials available on professional society and individual surgeon or practice based websites. Summary of Background Data. The Internet has become a valuable source of patient education material. A significant percentage of patients, however, find this Internet based information confusing. Healthcare experts recommend that the readability of patient education material be less than the sixth grade level. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level is the most widely used method to evaluate the readability score of textual material, with lower scores suggesting easier readability. Methods. We conducted an Internet search of all patient education documents on the North American Spine Society (NASS), American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), and a sample of 10 individual surgeon or practice based websites. The Flesch-Kincaid grade level of each article was calculated using widely available Microsoft Office Word software. The mean grade level of articles on the various professional society and individual/practice based websites were compared. Results. A total of 121 articles from the various websites were available and analyzed. All 4 categories of websites had mean Flesch-Kincaid grade levels greater than 10. Only 3 articles (2.5%) were found to be at or below the sixth grade level, the recommended readability level for adult patients in the United States. There were no significant differences among the mean Flesch-Kincaid grade levels from the AAOS, NASS, AANS, and practice-based web-sites (P = 0.065, ANOVA). Conclusion. Our findings suggest that most of the Spine-related patient education materials on professional society and practice-based websites have readability scores that may be too high, making comprehension difficult for a substantial portion of the United States adult population.
引用
收藏
页码:2826 / 2831
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Readability of patient education materials: Implications for clinical practice
    Albright, J
    deGuzman, C
    Acebo, P
    Paiva, D
    Faulkner, M
    Swanson, J
    [J]. APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 1996, 9 (03) : 139 - 143
  • [2] Health literacy: A review
    Andrus, MR
    Roth, MT
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2002, 22 (03): : 282 - 302
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, ONLINE HLTH SEARCH 2
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1996, Psychol Health Med, DOI DOI 10.1080/13548509608400003
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, COCHRANE DATABASE SY
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1999, SCI TECHN INF SIMPL
  • [7] Evaluation of internet use by paediatric orthopaedic outpatients and the quality of information available
    Aslam, N
    Bowyer, D
    Wainwright, A
    Theologis, T
    Benson, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2005, 14 (02): : 129 - 133
  • [8] Readability of patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America web sites
    Badarudeen, Sameer
    Sabharwal, Sanjeev
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (01) : 199 - 204
  • [9] Functional health literacy and the risk of hospital admission among Medicare managed care enrollees
    Baker, DW
    Gazmararian, JA
    Williams, MV
    Scott, T
    Parker, RM
    Green, D
    Ren, JL
    Peel, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2002, 92 (08) : 1278 - 1283
  • [10] Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice
    Barry, MJ
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (02) : 127 - 135