Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy: Swallowing, Voice, and Speech Outcomes

被引:33
作者
Webster, Kimberly T. [1 ]
Samlan, Robin A. [1 ]
Jones, Bronwyn [2 ]
Bunton, Kate [3 ]
Tufano, Ralph P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
functional outcome; supracricoid laryngectomy; swallowing; voice; CRICOHYOIDOEPIGLOTTOPEXY; PRESERVATION; DEGLUTITION;
D O I
10.1177/000348941011900102
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to describe the swallowing and vocal function of patients after supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCPL) as they changed over the first postoperative year. Methods: Ten patients with laryngeal carcinoma underwent SCPL at Johns Hopkins Hospital between August 2003 and May 2005. Clinical and videofluoroscopic swallowing examinations and perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and video-stroboscopic voice evaluations were completed before operation and at 3 weeks (swallowing only) and 2 (voice only), 6, and 12 months after operation. Results: The mean time to gastrostomy tube removal was 82 days. The patients tolerated an increased variety of foods over the first postoperative year. All patients initially used therapeutic strategies to swallow safely, and some still required them at 1 postoperative year. Over the year, the perceptual ratings of voice quality improved significantly. There were no consistent changes in acoustic or aerodynamic measures. The number of patients who used multiple vibratory sources to phonate increased over the year. Conclusions: The patients tolerated regular diets, yet continued to exhibit silent aspiration and a variety of decompensations. Their voices were breathy, rough, and strained. Their voice quality ratings improved over the year. Group changes were not captured, and it appears that the changes in speech and voice 2 months after surgery were subtle.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 16
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] *AM SPEECH LANG HE, 2003, SPEC INT DIV 3 VOIC
  • [2] BOERSNIA P, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC
  • [3] Voice and deglutition functions after the supracricoid and total laryngectomy procedures for advanced stage laryngeal carcinoma
    Dworkin, JP
    Meleca, RJ
    Zacharek, MA
    Stachler, RJ
    Pasha, R
    Abkarian, GG
    Culatta, RA
    Jacobs, JR
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 129 (04) : 311 - 320
  • [4] Jacobson BH., 1997, Am J Speech Lang Pathol, V6, P66, DOI [10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66, DOI 10.1044/1058-0360.0603.66]
  • [5] LACCOURREYE H, 1990, LARYNGOSCOPE, V100, P735
  • [6] SUPRACRICOID LARYNGECTOMY WITH CRICOHYOIDOEPIGLOTTOPEXY - A PARTIAL LARYNGEAL PROCEDURE FOR GLOTTIC CARCINOMA
    LACCOURREYE, O
    MENARD, M
    WEINSTEIN, G
    BRASNU, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1990, 99 (06) : 421 - 426
  • [7] DURATION AND FREQUENCY-CHARACTERISTICS OF SPEECH AND VOICE FOLLOWING SUPRACRICOID PARTIAL LARYNGECTOMY
    LACCOURREYE, O
    CREVIERBUCHMANN, L
    WEINSTEIN, G
    BIACABE, B
    LACCOURREYE, H
    BRASNU, D
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1995, 104 (07) : 516 - 521
  • [8] Functional analysis of swallowing outcomes after supracricoid partial laryngectomy
    Lewin, Jan S.
    Hutcheson, Katherine A.
    Barringer, Denise A.
    May, Annette H.
    Roberts, Dianna B.
    Holsinger, Christopher
    Diaz, Eduardo M., Jr.
    [J]. HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2008, 30 (05): : 559 - 566
  • [9] Acoustic and aerodynamic measurement of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy
    Makeieff, M
    Barbotte, E
    Giovanni, A
    Guerrier, B
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (03) : 546 - 551
  • [10] Supracricoid laryngectomy: Is it time to define guidelines to evaluate functional results? A review
    Marioni, G
    Marchese-Ragona, R
    Ottaviano, G
    Staffieri, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2004, 25 (02) : 98 - 104