Reporting of adverse drug reactions by poison control centres in the US

被引:18
作者
Chyka, PA
McCommon, SW
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Pharm Practice & Pharmacoecon, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] So Poison Ctr, Memphis, TN USA
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00002018-200023010-00006
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Although US poison control centres manage approximately 30 000 adverse drug reactions each year, the extent of voluntary reporting of these events to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) MedWatch spontaneous surveillance programme is unknown. Methods: A survey was mailed to directors of all 72 US poison control centres during April 1999 to determine their practices and opinions on reporting adverse drug reactions. The survey requested information on the poison control centre staff's practices in reporting adverse drug reactions to the FDA MedWatch programme during 1998. Results: A total of 56 fully completed surveys were returned. Of the respondents, 30 had not directly submitted adverse drug reaction reports to the FDA, 22 had submitted 10 or less, and 4 had submitted a total of 47 during 1998 Reasons given for not routinely reporting adverse drug reactions included adverse drug reactions reporting is not part of the regular routine (20%), lack of time to complete forms (15%), inability to determine causality (13%), most reactions are already reported and not unique (10%), reporting to the FDA is too much work (9%), and responsibility rests with the attending physician (7%). Direct reporting to MedWatch of ally cases of adverse drug reactions was more likely when the poison control centre was certified by the American Association of Poison Control Centers (p < 0.05; odds ratio = 5.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 23.5); however, this practice was not associated with documenting deaths associated with adverse drug reactions. having more than 75% of the staff of the Poison Information Specialists composed of pharmacists or nurses, or managing greater than 20 000 or 34 000 human exposure cases during 1998. Approximately half of the poison control centres directly or indirectly reported some adverse drug reactions to the FDA by virtue of contacting the manufacturer or cooperating with postmarketing surveillance. Conclusion: Poison control centres represent an underutilised source of reporting to MedWatch, but several internal and external obstacles limit the direct reporting of adverse drug reactions routinely.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 93
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Aparasu R R, 1999, J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash), V39, P332
  • [2] A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation
    Bate, A
    Lindquist, M
    Edwards, IR
    Olsson, S
    Orre, R
    Lansner, A
    De Freitas, RM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 54 (04) : 315 - 321
  • [3] Drugs and adverse drug reactions - How worried should we be?
    Bates, DW
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (15): : 1216 - 1217
  • [4] Calvert WS, 1999, DRUG INF J, V33, P1093, DOI 10.1177/009286159903300413
  • [5] Chyka PA, 1999, VET HUM TOXICOL, V41, P400
  • [6] THE INCIDENT REPORTING SYSTEM DOES NOT DETECT ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS - A PROBLEM FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
    CULLEN, DJ
    BATES, DW
    SMALL, SD
    COOPER, JB
    NEMESKAL, AR
    LEAPE, LL
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1995, 21 (10): : 541 - 548
  • [7] DYER J, 1990, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V39, P861
  • [8] *FOOD DRUG ADM CTR, 1996, ANN ADV DRUG EXP REP
  • [9] KNOWLEDGE OF AND ATTITUDES ABOUT ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING AMONG RHODE-ISLAND PHARMACISTS
    GENERALI, JA
    DANISH, MA
    ROSENBAUM, SE
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1995, 29 (04) : 365 - 369
  • [10] Hopkins U., 1999, Journal of Toxicology Clinical Toxicology, V37, P648