Adopting bioenergy crops: Does farmers' attitude toward loss matter?

被引:23
作者
Anand, Mohit [1 ]
Miao, Ruiqing [2 ]
Khanna, Madhu [3 ]
机构
[1] Miles Coll, Business & Accounting Div, Fairfield, AL USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Agr Econ & Rural Sociol, 208B Comer Hall, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Urbana, IL USA
关键词
bioenergy crops; crop insurance; establishment cost; loss aversion; miscanthus; prospect theory; switchgrass; D81; Q15; Q16; ENERGY CROPS; RISK PREFERENCES; PROSPECT-THEORY; LAND;
D O I
10.1111/agec.12501
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
We apply prospect theory to examining farmers' economic incentives to divert a share of their land to bioenergy crops (miscanthus and switchgrass in this study). Numerical simulation is conducted for 1,919 rain-fed U.S. counties to identify the impact of loss aversion on bioenergy crop adoption, and how this impact is influenced by biomass price, discount rate, credit constraint status, and policy instruments. Results show that ignoring farmer's loss aversion causes overestimation of miscanthus production but underestimation of switchgrass production, particularly when farmers are credit constrained and have a high discount rate. We find that establishment cost subsidy induces more miscanthus production whereas subsidized energy crop insurance induces more switchgrass production. The efficacy of these two policy instruments, measured by biomass production increased by per dollar of government outlay, depends on the magnitude of farmers' loss aversion and discount rate.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 450
页数:16
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Anand M., 2017, SO AGR EC ASS 2017 A
  • [2] Impacts of management practices on bioenergy feedstock yield and economic feasibility on Conservation Reserve Program grasslands
    Anderson, Eric K.
    Aberle, Ezra
    Chen, Chengci
    Egenolf, Josh
    Harmoney, Keith
    Kakani, Vijaya Gopal
    Kallenbach, Robert
    Khanna, Madhu
    Wang, Weiwei
    Lee, DoKyoung
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (06): : 1178 - 1190
  • [3] Thirty Years of Prospect Theory in Economics: A Review and Assessment
    Barberis, Nicholas C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2013, 27 (01) : 173 - 195
  • [4] Bocqueho G., 2015, RISK ENV SESS JOURN
  • [5] Alternative transportation fuel standards: Welfare effects and climate benefits
    Chen, Xiaoguang
    Huang, Haixiao
    Khanna, Madhu
    Oenal, Hayri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 67 (03) : 241 - 257
  • [6] A stochastic analysis of the decision to produce biomass crops in Ireland
    Clancy, Daragh
    Breen, James P.
    Thorne, Fiona
    Wallace, Michael
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 46 : 353 - 365
  • [7] A Stochastic Approach for Predicting the Profitability of Bioenergy Grasses
    Dolginow, Joseph
    Massey, Raymond E.
    Kitchen, Newell R.
    Myers, David B.
    Sudduth, Kenneth A.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (06) : 2137 - 2145
  • [8] Du X., 2012, Applied Economics, V44, P265
  • [9] Challenges to the development of a dedicated energy crop
    Epplin, Francis M.
    Clark, Christopher D.
    Roberts, Roland K.
    Hwang, Seonghuyk
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 89 (05) : 1296 - 1302
  • [10] Farm Service Agency of US Department of Agriculture, 2013, BCAP BIOM CROP ASS P