Sustainable municipal waste management strategies through life cycle assessment method: A review

被引:113
作者
Zhang, Junting [1 ]
Qin, Quande [1 ]
Li, Guangming [2 ]
Tseng, Chao-Heng [3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Management, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Tongji Univ, Coll Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Inst Environm Engn & Management, Taipei 106, Taiwan
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Municipal solid waste; Integrated waste management; Environmental impact assessment; System evaluation; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; MATERIAL FLOW-ANALYSIS; SOLID-WASTE; ORGANIC WASTE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; ENERGY-PRODUCTION; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ASSESSMENT LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112238
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing amounts of municipal solid waste (MSW) has gained widely concern on reduction, utilization and minimizing environmental impacts associated with waste management. Life cycle assessment (LCA) has been used to evaluate total environmental impact of municipal waste management (MSWM) options in strategyplanning and decision-making process. The exiting LCA studies have covered a large range of detailed focus from waste treatment technology to applied modelling methods in LCA of MSWM, yet an important concern for stakeholders, the relationship between practical management strategies and their LCA results, has not been comprehensively summarized. This paper reviews recent LCA studies focusing on MSWM system in 45 cases from both developing and developed regions to promote evolution of the MSWM system through modification of waste management strategies. Selected literatures conducted LCA with system boundary covering the whole MSWM system rather than single treatment process or specific type of waste. This review has explored distribution and evolution of LCA studies in waste management field and summarized critical parameters (system boundary, functional unit, assessment approach and data uncertainty) for conducting LCA of MSWM system. Comparison results from 45 worldwide cases indicated 33%?154% environmental benefit in Global warming potential (GWP) impact with implement of integrated solid waste management system to replace single landfill, incineration, or open dumping treatment. Key issues with upgrading of MSWM system have been highlighted to raise concern, i. e., the importance of targeted management strategy on organic and recyclable waste, the growing contribution of waste collection and transportation to the total environmental impact, as well as promoting multi-impacts assessment for MSWM system to achieve environmentally effective, economically affordable, and socially acceptable. Rather than focus on technical factors, results from this study indicated the key influences from understanding local limitation, environmental concern, management chain and comprehensive impact, providing useful strategies on improving MSWM with generalization results of LCA studies.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis [J].
Aghbashlo, Mortaza ;
Tabatabaei, Meisam ;
Soltanian, Salman ;
Ghanavati, Hossein .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 143 :64-76
[2]   Comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a municipal solid waste digestion plant equipped with a biogas genset [J].
Aghbashlo, Mortaza ;
Tabatabaei, Meisam ;
Soltanian, Salman ;
Ghanavati, Hossein ;
Dadak, Ali .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 87 :485-498
[3]   Life cycle assessment of the present and proposed food waste management technologies from environmental and economic impact perspectives [J].
Ahamed, A. ;
Yin, K. ;
Ng, B. J. H. ;
Ren, F. ;
Chang, V. W. -C. ;
Wang, J. -Y. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 :607-614
[4]   A triple bottom line evaluation of solid waste management strategies: a case study for an arid Gulf State, Kuwait [J].
Aleisa, Esra ;
Al-Jarallah, Rawa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (07) :1460-1475
[5]   Organic waste biorefineries: Looking towards implementation [J].
Alibardi, Luca ;
Astrup, Thomas F. ;
Asunis, Fabiano ;
Clarke, William P. ;
De Gioannis, Giorgia ;
Dessi, Paolo ;
Lens, Piet N. L. ;
Lavagnolo, Maria Cristina ;
Lombardi, Lidia ;
Muntoni, Aldo ;
Pivato, Alberto ;
Polettini, Alessandra ;
Pomi, Raffaella ;
Rossi, Andreina ;
Spagni, Alessandro ;
Spiga, Daniela .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 114 :274-286
[6]   Environmental performance and energy recovery potential of five processes for municipal solid waste treatment [J].
Arafat, Hassan A. ;
Jijakli, Kenan ;
Ahsan, Amimul .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 105 :233-240
[7]   A life cycle assessment of environmental performances of two combustion- and gasification-based waste-to-energy technologies [J].
Arena, Umberto ;
Ardolino, Filomena ;
Di Gregorio, Fabrizio .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 :60-74
[8]   Life Cycle Assessment of the existing and proposed plastic waste management options in India: A case study [J].
Aryan, Yash ;
Yadav, Pooja ;
Samadder, Sukha Ranjan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 :1268-1283
[9]   Life cycle assessment of thermal Waste-to-Energy technologies: Review and recommendations [J].
Astrup, Thomas Fruergaard ;
Tonini, Davide ;
Turconi, Roberto ;
Boldrin, Alessio .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 37 :104-115
[10]   Do life -cycle costing and assessment integration support decision-making towards sustainable development? [J].
Atia, Noha Gawdat ;
Bassily, Makram A. ;
Elamer, Ahmed A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 267