Integrating a remote microphone with hearing-aid processing

被引:11
|
作者
Kates, James M. [1 ]
Arehart, Kathryn H., Jr. [1 ]
Harvey, Lewis O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA | 2019年 / 145卷 / 06期
关键词
DYNAMIC-RANGE COMPRESSION; SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY; IMPAIRED LISTENERS; REVERBERANT SPEECH; NOISE-REDUCTION; HEAD; EXTERNALIZATION; LOCALIZATION; PERCEPTION; REFLECTIONS;
D O I
10.1121/1.5111339
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
A remote microphone (RM) links a talker's microphone to a listener's hearing aids (HAs). The RM improves intelligibility in noise and reverberation, but the binaural cues necessary for externalization are lost. Augmenting the RM signal with synthesized binaural cues and early reflections enhances externalization, but interactions of the RM signal with the HA processing could reduce its effectiveness. These potential interactions were evaluated using RM plus HA processing in a realistic listening simulation. The HA input was the RM alone, the augmented RM signal, the acoustic inputs at the HA microphones, including reverberation measured using a dummy head, or a mixture of the augmented RM and acoustic input signals. The HA simulation implemented linear amplification or independent dynamic-range compression at the two ears and incorporated the acoustic effects of vented earmolds. Hearing-impaired listeners scored sentence stimuli for intelligibility and rated clarity, overall quality, externalization, and apparent source width. Using the RM improved intelligibility but reduced the spatial impression. Increasing the vent diameter reduced clarity and increased the spatial impression. Listener ratings reflect a trade-off between the attributes of clarity and overall quality and the attributes of externalization and source width that can be explained using the interaural cross correlation.
引用
收藏
页码:3551 / 3566
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF HEARING-AID MICROPHONE LOCATION ON INTELLIGIBILITY OF HEARING-AID TRANSDUCED SPEECH
    FRANKS, JR
    FETH, LL
    DANILOFF, RG
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1976, 59 : S69 - S69
  • [2] Integrating cognitive and peripheral factors in predicting hearing-aid processing effectiveness
    Kates, James M.
    Arehart, Kathryn H.
    Souza, Pamela E.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2013, 134 (06): : 4458 - 4469
  • [3] HEARING-AID PERFORMANCE AND HEARING-AID SELECTION
    JERGER, J
    SPEAKS, C
    MALMQUIST, C
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1966, 9 (01): : 136 - +
  • [4] TOWARD A THEORY OF OPTIMAL HEARING-AID PROCESSING
    KATES, JM
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 30 (01): : 39 - 48
  • [5] NEW HEARING-AID USERS PERCEPTION OF THE HEARING-AID EFFECT
    SURR, RK
    HAWKINS, DB
    EAR AND HEARING, 1988, 9 (03): : 113 - 118
  • [6] COMPUTER GENERATED PROBE-MICROPHONE MEASUREMENTS IN HEARING-AID SELECTION
    ORCHIK, DJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1990, 11 (02): : 125 - 127
  • [7] HEAD-BAFFLE EFFECT FOR DIFFERENT HEARING-AID MICROPHONE LOCATIONS
    LYBARGER, SF
    BARRON, FE
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1965, 38 (05): : 922 - &
  • [8] HEARING-AID
    KIM, I
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1990, 112 (02) : 130 - 130
  • [9] HEARING-AID
    FURST
    HNO, 1977, 25 (11) : 409 - 409
  • [10] HEARING-AID MICROPHONE LOCATION EFFECTS ON SPEECH-DISCRIMINATION IN NOISE
    FRANKS, JR
    FETH, LL
    DANILOFF, RG
    EAR AND HEARING, 1981, 2 (06): : 241 - 250