Evaluation of exposures to healthcare personnel from cisplatin during a mock demonstration of intra-operative intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration

被引:4
作者
Kushnir, Christina L. [1 ]
Fleury, Aimee C. [2 ]
Couch, James [3 ]
Hill, Michael C. [4 ]
Spirtos, Nick M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Kelly Gynecol Oncol Serv, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Womens Canc Ctr Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89109 USA
[3] NIOSH, Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Surveillance Hazard Evaluat & Field Studies, Hazard Evaluat & Tech Assistance Branch, Cincinnati, OH 45226 USA
[4] Univ Nevada, Sch Med, Reno, NV 89557 USA
关键词
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy; Advanced ovarian cancer; Cisplatin; Healthcare safety; Optimal cytoreductive surgery; Personal protective equipment; STAGE-III OVARIAN; GYNECOLOGIC-ONCOLOGY-GROUP; CANCER; PACLITAXEL; TRIAL; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; CARBOPLATIN; INTERGROUP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.04.467
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies in the United States. In 2006, the National Cancer Institute released an announcement supporting the use of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. It remains unanswered how many cycles of IP chemotherapy are required to maintain a survival advantage. There may be a benefit with as few as three IP cycles and possibly as few as one IP chemotherapy cycle. Objective. In preparation for a clinical trial in which chemotherapy would be administered intraoperatively, the question of exposure to healthcare personnel arose, therefore, the purpose of this study was to perform an evaluation of healthcare personnel exposure to cisplatin during a mock demonstration of intraperitoneal chemotherapy administration. Materials and methods. The National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Women's Cancer Center of Nevada, and the staff of the University Medical Center, Las Vegas, participated in this mock demonstration. Employees wore personal protective equipment recommended by NIOSH. Wipe, area, and breathing zone air samples were taken from the pharmacy and operating room, and during sterilization of equipment. Results. All samples were negative for cisplatin, except for one surface wipe from the floor of the operating room (OR) after the mock procedure. Upon sanitization of the OR, no cisplatin was detected on the floor. Conclusion. This was the first study evaluating the exposure of healthcare personnel to the administration of cisplatin intra-operatively. NIOSH endorsed this practice so long as the employees adhere to using the recommended personal protective equipment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 353
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer
    Alberts, DS
    Liu, PY
    Hannigan, EV
    OToole, R
    Williams, SD
    Young, JA
    Franklin, EW
    ClarkePearson, DL
    Malviya, VK
    DuBeshter, B
    Adelson, MD
    Hoskins, WJ
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (26) : 1950 - 1955
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Tobacco Smoke and Involuntary Smoking
  • [3] Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer
    Armstrong, DK
    Bundy, B
    Wenzel, L
    Huang, HQ
    Baergen, R
    Lele, S
    Copeland, LJ
    Walker, JL
    Burger, RA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (01) : 34 - 43
  • [4] Bedford Laboratories, 2009, CISPL MAT SAF DAT SH
  • [5] Couch J, 2010, 200901213106 NIOSH H
  • [6] Phase III trial of standard-dose intravenous cisplatin plus paclitaxel versus moderately high-dose carboplatin followed by intravenous paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in small-volume stage III ovarian carcinoma: An intergroup study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group, Southwestern Oncology Group, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
    Markman, M
    Bundy, BN
    Alberts, DS
    Fowler, JM
    Clark-Pearson, DL
    Carson, LF
    Wadler, S
    Sickel, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) : 1001 - 1007
  • [7] Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer
    McGuire, WP
    Hoskins, WJ
    Brady, MF
    Kucera, PR
    Partridge, EE
    Look, KY
    ClarkePearson, DL
    Davidson, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [8] Phase III trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study
    Ozols, RF
    Bundy, BN
    Greer, BE
    Fowler, JM
    Clarke-Pearson, D
    Burger, RA
    Mannel, RS
    DeGeest, K
    Hartenbach, EM
    Baergen, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) : 3194 - 3200
  • [9] Combined intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer: Results from an intergroup phase II trial
    Rothenberg, ML
    Liu, PY
    Braly, PS
    Wilczynski, SP
    Hannigan, EV
    Wadler, S
    Stuart, G
    Jiang, C
    Markman, M
    Alberts, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (07) : 1313 - 1319
  • [10] The Impact of Eliminating Socioeconomic and Racial Disparities on Premature Cancer Deaths
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ward, Elizabeth
    Brawley, Otis
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2011, 61 (04) : 212 - 236