Precision Medicine

被引:220
作者
Kosorok, Michael R. [1 ,2 ]
Laber, Eric B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 6 | 2019年 / 6卷
关键词
data-driven decision science; dynamic treatment regimes; machine learning; patient heterogeneity; statistical inference; DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES; ESTIMATING INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT; CAUSAL INFERENCE; TREATMENT RULES; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; VARIABLE SELECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; LEARNING-METHODS; ROBUST METHOD; MODELS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105251
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Precision medicine seeks to maximize the quality of health care by individualizing the health-care process to the uniquely evolving health status of each patient. This endeavor spans a broad range of scientific areas including drug discovery, genetics/genomics, health communication, and causal inference, all in support of evidence-based, i.e., data-driven, decision making. Precision medicine is formalized as a treatment regime that comprises a sequence of decision rules, one per decision point, which map up-to-date patient information to a recommended action. The potential actions could be the selection of which drug to use, the selection of dose, the timing of administration, the recommendation of a specific diet or exercise, or other aspects of treatment or care. Statistics research in precision medicine is broadly focused on methodological development for estimation of and inference for treatment regimes that maximize some cumulative clinical outcome. In this review, we provide an overview of this vibrant area of research and present important and emerging challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 286
页数:24
相关论文
共 153 条
  • [11] Butler EL., 2016, THESIS U N C CHAPEL
  • [12] Incorporating Patient Preferences into Estimation of Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules
    Butler, Emily L.
    Laber, Eric B.
    Davis, Sonia M.
    Kosorok, Michael R.
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (01) : 18 - 26
  • [13] Cesa-Bianchi Nicolo, 2006, PREDICTION LEARNING
  • [14] Chakraborty B., 2013, Statistics for Biology and Health, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7428-9
  • [15] Inference about the expected performance of a data-driven dynamic treatment regime
    Chakraborty, Bibhas
    Laber, Eric B.
    Zhao, Ying-Qi
    [J]. CLINICAL TRIALS, 2014, 11 (04) : 408 - 417
  • [16] Inference for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes Using an Adaptive m-Out-of-n Bootstrap Scheme
    Chakraborty, Bibhas
    Laber, Eric B.
    Zhao, Yingqi
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2013, 69 (03) : 714 - 723
  • [17] Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes
    Chakraborty, Bibhas
    Murphy, Susan
    Strecher, Victor
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (03) : 317 - 343
  • [18] Personalized Dose Finding Using Outcome Weighted Learning
    Chen, Guanhua
    Zeng, Donglin
    Kosorok, Michael R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 111 (516) : 1509 - 1521
  • [19] Estimating individualized treatment rules for ordinal treatments
    Chen, Jingxiang
    Fu, Haoda
    He, Xuanyao
    Kosorok, Michael R.
    Liu, Yufeng
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2018, 74 (03) : 924 - 933
  • [20] Sufficient dimension reduction via inverse regression: A minimum discrepancy approach
    Cook, RD
    Ni, LQ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 100 (470) : 410 - 428