Precision Medicine

被引:220
作者
Kosorok, Michael R. [1 ,2 ]
Laber, Eric B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Stat, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 6 | 2019年 / 6卷
关键词
data-driven decision science; dynamic treatment regimes; machine learning; patient heterogeneity; statistical inference; DYNAMIC TREATMENT REGIMES; ESTIMATING INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT; CAUSAL INFERENCE; TREATMENT RULES; EXPERIMENTAL-DESIGN; VARIABLE SELECTION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; LEARNING-METHODS; ROBUST METHOD; MODELS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-statistics-030718-105251
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Precision medicine seeks to maximize the quality of health care by individualizing the health-care process to the uniquely evolving health status of each patient. This endeavor spans a broad range of scientific areas including drug discovery, genetics/genomics, health communication, and causal inference, all in support of evidence-based, i.e., data-driven, decision making. Precision medicine is formalized as a treatment regime that comprises a sequence of decision rules, one per decision point, which map up-to-date patient information to a recommended action. The potential actions could be the selection of which drug to use, the selection of dose, the timing of administration, the recommendation of a specific diet or exercise, or other aspects of treatment or care. Statistics research in precision medicine is broadly focused on methodological development for estimation of and inference for treatment regimes that maximize some cumulative clinical outcome. In this review, we provide an overview of this vibrant area of research and present important and emerging challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 286
页数:24
相关论文
共 153 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2015, FACT SHEET PRESIDENT
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, MODELING CONTROL DYN
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning
  • [5] Athey S, 2017, ARXIV170202896MATHST
  • [6] Optimal treatment regimes for survival endpoints using a locally-efficient doubly-robust estimator from a classification perspective
    Bai, Xiaofei
    Tsiatis, Anastasios A.
    Lu, Wenbin
    Song, Rui
    [J]. LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2017, 23 (04) : 585 - 604
  • [7] Control Engineering Methods for the Design of Robust Behavioral Treatments
    Bekiroglu, Korkut
    Lagoa, Constantino
    Murphy, Suzan A.
    Lanza, Stephanie T.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 25 (03) : 979 - 990
  • [8] Analyzing sequentially randomized trials based on causal effect models for realistic individualized treatment rules
    Bembom, Oliver
    van der Laan, Mark J.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (19) : 3689 - 3716
  • [9] A Comparison of Variable Selection Approaches for Dynamic Treatment Regimes
    Biernot, Peter
    Moodie, Erica E. M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOSTATISTICS, 2010, 6 (01)
  • [10] Busoniu L, 2010, AUTOM CONTROL ENG SE, P1, DOI 10.1201/9781439821091-f