On the universality of free fall, the equivalence principle, and the gravitational redshift

被引:27
|
作者
Nobili, A. M. [1 ,2 ]
Lucchesi, D. M. [2 ,3 ]
Crosta, M. T. [4 ]
Shao, M. [5 ]
Turyshev, S. G. [5 ]
Peron, R. [3 ]
Catastini, G. [6 ]
Anselmi, A. [6 ]
Zavattini, G. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Phys E Fermi, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Pisa, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[3] IAPS, INAF, I-00133 Rome, Italy
[4] Osservatorio Astrofis Torino, INAF, Turin, Italy
[5] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[6] Thales Alenia Space Italia, I-10146 Turin, Italy
[7] Univ Ferrara, Dept Phys, I-44122 Ferrara, Italy
[8] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Ferrara, I-44122 Ferrara, Italy
关键词
INERTIAL MASS; ANISOTROPY;
D O I
10.1119/1.4798583
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Through the contributions of Galileo, Newton, and Einstein, we recall the universality of free fall (UFF), the weak equivalence principle (WEP), and the strong equivalence principle (SEP), in order to stress that general relativity requires all test masses to be equally accelerated in a gravitational field; that is, it requires UFF and WEP to hold. The possibility of testing this crucial fact with null, highly sensitive experiments makes these the most powerful tests of the theory. Following Schiff, we derive the gravitational redshift from the WEP and special relativity and show that, as long as clocks are affected by a gravitating body like normal matter, measurement of the redshift is a test of UFF/WEP but cannot compete with direct null tests. A new measurement of the gravitational redshift based on free-falling cold atoms and an absolute gravimeter is not competitive either. Finally, we compare UFF/WEP experiments using macroscopic masses as test bodies in one case and cold atoms in the other. We conclude that there is no difference in the nature of the test and that the merit of any such experiment rests on the accuracy it can achieve and on the physical differences between the elements it can test, macroscopic proof masses being superior in both respects. (C) 2013 American Association of Physics Teachers.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 536
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT AND EQUIVALENCE PRINCIPLE
    LANDSBERG, PT
    BISHOP, NT
    FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS, 1976, 6 (06) : 727 - 737
  • [2] Equivalence Principle and Gravitational Redshift
    Hohensee, Michael A.
    Chu, Steven
    Peters, Achim
    Mueller, Holger
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2011, 106 (15)
  • [3] Atom-interferometric test of the universality of gravitational redshift and free fall
    Ufrecht, Christian
    Di Pumpo, Fabio
    Friedrich, Alexander
    Roura, Albert
    Schubert, Christian
    Schlippert, Dennis
    Rasel, Ernst M.
    Schleich, Wolfgang P.
    Giese, Enno
    PHYSICAL REVIEW RESEARCH, 2020, 2 (04):
  • [4] Gravitational redshift, equivalence principle, and matter waves
    Hohensee, Michael A.
    Estey, Brian
    Monsalve, Francisco
    Kim, Geena
    Kuan, Pei-Chen
    Lan, Shau-Yu
    Mueller, Holger
    22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ATOMIC PHYSICS, 2011, 264
  • [5] Do general relativistic effects limit experiments to test the universality of free fall and the weak equivalence principle?
    Nobili, Anna M.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2016, 94 (12)
  • [6] Free fall in KvN mechanics and Einstein's principle of equivalence
    Sen, Abhijit
    Dhasmana, Shailesh
    Silagadze, Zurab K.
    ANNALS OF PHYSICS, 2020, 422
  • [7] Measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant based on the principle of free fall
    WANG Yong KE XiaoPing ZHANG WeiMin XU HouZe WANG HuBiao CHAI HuaInstitute of Geodesy and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Wuhan China
    Chinese Science Bulletin, 2009, 54 (06) : 1019 - 1025
  • [8] Measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant based on the principle of free fall
    Wang Yong
    Ke XiaoPing
    Zhang WeiMin
    Xu HouZe
    Wang HuBiao
    Chai Hua
    CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2009, 54 (06): : 1019 - 1025
  • [9] Gravitational shielding and the equivalence principle
    Savrov, L. A.
    GRAVITATION & COSMOLOGY, 2012, 18 (04): : 270 - 278