Attentive Reading and Constrained Summarisation (ARCS) discourse treatment for chronic Wernicke's aphasia

被引:12
作者
Rogalski, Yvonne [1 ]
Edmonds, Lisa A. [2 ,3 ]
Daly, Valerie R. [1 ]
Gardner, Melissa J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ithaca Coll, Dept Speech Language Pathol & Audiol, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[2] Malcom Randall Vet Affairs, Brain Rehabil & Res Ctr, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, Gainesville, FL USA
关键词
Wernicke's; Aphasia; Intervention; ARCS; Discourse; Anomia; SEMANTIC FEATURE ANALYSIS; THERAPY; SPEECH; STORY; REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY; IMPAIRMENT; FEEDBACK; DEAFNESS; ANOMIA;
D O I
10.1080/02687038.2013.810327
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background: Emerging evidence suggests that discourse-level treatments can improve microlinguistic processes such as lexical retrieval. Attentive Reading and Constrained Summarisation (ARCS) is a cognitive-linguistic discourse treatment that focuses attention on reading aloud and orally summarising text while constraining from non-specific language use.Aims: The primary aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of ARCS on improving lexical retrieval abilities in two participants with Wernicke's aphasia.Methods & Procedures: Two women with chronic moderate and severe Wernicke's aphasia were administered ARCS for this case study. The study design was comprised of pre-treatment testing followed by 18 times of 50-minute sessions of ARCS therapy over 10 weeks and post-treatment testing immediately after and 2 months after the completion of treatment. Treatment stimuli included abridged versions of news articles. Primary outcome measures of lexical retrieval were the Boston Naming Test 2nd edition and informativeness of words during picture description and untreated article retell tasks.Outcomes & Results: The participant with moderate Wernicke's aphasia improved on all three primary outcome measures, and she reported that the treatment made a functional impact on her life. In contrast, the participant with severe Wernicke's aphasia did not improve on any of the outcome measures. Individual differences between the participants likely account for the discrepancy in treatment outcomes.Conclusions: ARCS demonstrates potential as a therapy for improving lexical retrieval in discourse with the possibility of generalisation to confrontation naming in persons with moderate Wernicke's aphasia.
引用
收藏
页码:1232 / 1251
页数:20
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in Moderate-to-Severe Aphasia [J].
Edmonds, Lisa A. ;
Babb, Michelle .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2011, 20 (02) :131-145
[12]   Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: Extension and expansion [J].
Falconer, Carolyn ;
Antonucci, Sharon M. .
APHASIOLOGY, 2012, 26 (01) :64-82
[13]   Test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests: Performance of non-brain-damaged older adults [J].
Flanagan, JL ;
Jackson, ST .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 1997, 30 (01) :33-43
[14]   Cognitive rehabilitation of word meaning deafness [J].
Francis, DR ;
Riddoch, MJ ;
Humphreys, GW .
APHASIOLOGY, 2001, 15 (08) :749-766
[15]  
Howard D., 1992, The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: A Test for Semantic Access from Words and Pictures
[16]  
Kaplan E., 2001, BDAE: The boston diagnostic aphasia examination
[17]  
Kay J., 1992, Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA)
[18]  
Kertesz A., 2007, The Western aphasia battery
[19]  
Ledoux Kerry, 2006, Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, V5, P107, DOI 10.1177/1534582306289573
[20]   TESTS AND TEST FEEDBACK AS LEARNING SOURCES [J].
MCDANIEL, MA ;
FISHER, RP .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 16 (02) :192-201