Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in geriatric patients treated with the DLT trochanteric nail

被引:21
|
作者
Temiz, Aytun [1 ]
Durak, Aslihan [2 ]
Atici, Teoman [3 ]
机构
[1] Edremit State Hosp, Orthopaed & Traumatol Clin, Balikesir, Turkey
[2] Hakkari State Hosp, Emergency Med, Hakkari, Turkey
[3] Uludag Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, TR-16059 Nilufer, Bursa, Turkey
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2015年 / 46卷
关键词
Intertrochanteric fracture; Geriatric; Intramedullary nail; PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL; DYNAMIC HIP SCREW; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; INTRAMEDULLARY FIXATION; FAILURE; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; ANTIROTATION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.031
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate clinical-functional and radiological results of geriatric patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture treated with intramedullary nail. Materials and methods: Thirty-two patients treated with intramedullary nail (DLT trochanteric nail) due to unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures were reviewed retrospectively. Fractures 31-A2 and 31-A3 (AO classification) were evaluated. Operation time, blood loss, and blood transfusion requirements, hospitalization period, time to fracture union were evaluated and perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. According to the modified Baumgaertner criteria fracture reduction was analyzed radiologically, and nail tip-apex distance was measured. Femoral neck-shaft angle was also evaluated. Harris Hip Score for clinical evaluation and Kyo criteria for walking capacity were used. Results: The mean age was 72 years (65-81), mean follow up time was 18.3 months (12-26). Nineteen patients had type 31-A2 and 13 had type 31-A3 fractures. Mean operation time was 36.3 min (25-45), blood loss 185.9 ml (100-250). Blood transfusion was required in 7 patients. The average hospitalization duration was 6 days (4-14) while the time to surgery from admission was 2.9 days (2-6). Radiologically, in 21 of the cases fracture reduction was well (65.6%), acceptable in 9 (28.1%), and poor in 2 (6.3%). In early postoperative period, the mean collo-diaphyseal angle was 129.18 (120-1408), mean tip-apex distance was 15.5 mm (10-27). The mean Harris Hip Score was 63.4 (38-90). Two patients (6.3%) had excellent, 21 patients (65.6%) had good, 7 patients (21.8%) had moderate, and 2 patients (6.3%) had poor results. Walking capacity in the last follow-up in 20 of the cases (62.5%) was pre-fracture level. While complications were observed in seventeen patients (53.1%) (5 superficial wound infections, 5 fractures of the greater trochanter, 3 cases of secondary varus angulation and 4 cases of heterotopic ossification) none of them required additional surgery, no implant failures or cut-outs were observed. Conclusion: Functional and radiological results are satisfactory in using intramedullary nailing in the treatment of geriatric patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Optimum surgical technique can minimize the risk of implant-related complications. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S41 / S46
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biomechanical analysis of the cephalomedullary nail versus the trochanteric stabilizing plate for unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures
    Walmsley, David
    Nicayenzi, Bruce
    Kuzyk, Paul R. T.
    Machin, Alan
    Bougherara, Habiba
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    Zdero, Radovan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2016, 230 (12) : 1133 - 1140
  • [2] Medial Calcar Comminution and Intramedullary Nail Failure in Unstable Geriatric Trochanteric Hip Fractures
    Tarrant, Seth M.
    Graan, David
    Tarrant, Drew J.
    Kim, Raymond G.
    Balogh, Zsolt J.
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (04):
  • [3] Clinical and radiological outcomes of patients treated with the talon distalfix proximal femoral nail for intertrochanteric femur fractures
    Yapici, Furkan
    Ucpunar, Hanifi
    Camurcu, Yalkin
    Emirhan, Necati
    Tanoglu, Oguzhan
    Tardus, Ismail
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2020, 51 (04): : 1045 - 1050
  • [4] Comparison of unstable inter-trochanteric femur fracture treated with Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femur Nail
    Saleem, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Masroor
    Kumar, Mukesh
    Sahar, Khurram
    Hussain, Ghulam
    Bux, Muhammad
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (03): : 648 - 651
  • [5] Risk Factors for Complications in Trochanteric Femur Fractures Treated with Dyna Locking Trochanteric Nail
    Igrek, Servet
    Onay, Tolga
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF BAKIRKOY, 2023, 19 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [6] Effectiveness of Proximal Femur Nail in the Management of Unstable Per-Trochanteric Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Rashid, Rizwan H.
    Zahid, Marij
    Mariam, Fizzah
    Ali, Moiz
    Moiz, Hassan
    Mohib, Yasir
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [7] Intramedullary osteosynthesis of instable intertrochanteric femur fractures with Profin® nail in elderly patients
    Erturer, Ramazan Erden
    Sonmez, Mesut Mehmet
    Sari, Seckin
    Seckin, Mustafa Faik
    Kara, Adnan
    Ozturk, Irfan
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2012, 46 (02) : 107 - 112
  • [8] Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail
    Domingo L.J.
    Cecilia D.
    Herrera A.
    Resines C.
    International Orthopaedics, 2001, 25 (5) : 298 - 301
  • [9] The Results of Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation-2 with respect to Different Greater Trochanteric Entry Points
    Mallya, Sharan
    Kamath, Surendra U.
    Annappa, Rajendra
    Nazareth, Nithin Elliot
    Kamath, Krithika
    Tyagi, Pragya
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 2020
  • [10] Unstable Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures: Is There a Consensus on Definition and Treatment in Germany?
    Knobe, Matthias
    Gradl, Gertraud
    Ladenburger, Andreas
    Tarkin, Ivan S.
    Pape, Hans-Christoph
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (09) : 2831 - 2840