Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power

被引:5978
作者
Malterud, Kirsti [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Siersma, Volkert Dirk [2 ,3 ]
Guassora, Ann Dorrit [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Gen Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Uni Res Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Kalfarveien 31, N-5018 Bergen, Norway
[5] Univ Bergen, Dept Global Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Bergen, Norway
关键词
sample size; participants; methodology; saturation; information power; qualitative; SATURATION;
D O I
10.1177/1049732315617444
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Sample sizes must be ascertained in qualitative studies like in quantitative studies but not by the same means. The prevailing concept for sample size in qualitative studies is saturation. Saturation is closely tied to a specific methodology, and the term is inconsistently applied. We propose the concept information power to guide adequate sample size for qualitative studies. Information power indicates that the more information the sample holds, relevant for the actual study, the lower amount of participants is needed. We suggest that the size of a sample with sufficient information power depends on (a) the aim of the study, (b) sample specificity, (c) use of established theory, (d) quality of dialogue, and (e) analysis strategy. We present a model where these elements of information and their relevant dimensions are related to information power. Application of this model in the planning and during data collection of a qualitative study is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1760
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Alvesson MatsKaj Skoldberg., 2009, REFLEXIVE METHODOLOG, V2nd
[2]  
[Anonymous], Forum qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: qualitative social research, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-11.3.1428
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
[4]   Current sample size conventions: Flaws, harms, and alternatives [J].
Bacchetti, Peter .
BMC MEDICINE, 2010, 8
[5]  
Burt R.S., 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[6]   What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies [J].
Carlsen, Benedicte ;
Glenton, Claire .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2011, 11
[7]  
Chamberlain K, 2000, J Health Psychol, V5, P285, DOI 10.1177/135910530000500306
[8]   Evaluative Criteria for Qualitative Research in Health Care: Controversies and Recommendations [J].
Cohen, Deborah J. ;
Crabtree, Benjamin. F. .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2008, 6 (04) :331-339
[9]  
DePaulo P., 2000, Quirk's Marketing Research Review
[10]   How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability [J].
Guest, Greg ;
Bunce, Arwen ;
Johnson, Laura .
FIELD METHODS, 2006, 18 (01) :59-82