Understanding context effects for a measure of life evaluation: how responses matter
被引:39
作者:
Deaton, Angus
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Ctr Hlth & Wellbeing, Princeton, NJ 08544 USAPrinceton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Ctr Hlth & Wellbeing, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
Deaton, Angus
[1
]
Stone, Arthur A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Southern Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA USA
Univ Southern Calif, USC Dornsife Ctr Self Report Sci, Los Angeles, CA USAPrinceton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Ctr Hlth & Wellbeing, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
Stone, Arthur A.
[2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Ctr Hlth & Wellbeing, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, USC Dornsife Ctr Self Report Sci, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源:
OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES
|
2016年
/
68卷
/
04期
关键词:
D O I:
10.1093/oep/gpw022
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
We study context effects on responses to wellbeing questions. We find that those who were randomized into being asked a series of political questions subsequently report lower life evaluation; those who were previously asked about their evaluation of the direction of the United States lowered their own life evaluation, but only if they disapproved of the way the country was going. Subgroups of the population are affected in different ways; the age profile of wellbeing is tipped in favor of the elderly, and African American's life evaluations are increased when they are asked about President Obama's performance. The context effects are large, not easily removed, and change wellbeing rankings across groups.