Should NICE's threshold range for cost per QALY be raised? Yes

被引：60
作者：
Towse, Adrian [1 ]
机构：
[1] Off Hlth Econ, London SW1A 2DY, England
来源：
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2009年 / 338卷
关键词：
D O I：
10.1136/bmj.b181
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页数：3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], GUID METH TECHN APPR
[2]  
APPLEBY J, HLTH POLICY IN PRESS
[3]  
Culyer Anthony, 2007, J Health Serv Res Policy, V12, P56, DOI 10.1258/135581907779497567
[4]  
*DEP TRANSP, 2007, 12005 DEP TRANSP
[5]   Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: In search of a standard [J].
Hirth, RA ;
Chernew, ME ;
Miller, E ;
Fendrick, AM ;
Weissert, WG .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (03) :332-342
[6]  
*HOUS COMM HLTH SE, 2008, 1 REP SESS 2007 08, P103
[7]  
MARTIN S, 2007, LINK HLTH CARE SPEND
[8]  
MASON H, 2008, HLTH EC 1014
[9]   The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold - What it is and what that means [J].
McCabe, Christopher ;
Claxton, Karl ;
Culyer, Anthony J. .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (09) :733-744
[10]  
*NAT I HLTH CLIN E, 2008, NICES RESP COMM 1 RE
12