Validity of at home model predictions as a proxy for personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations

被引:19
作者
Martens, Astrid L. [1 ,2 ]
Bolte, John F. B. [3 ]
Beekhuizen, Johan [1 ]
Kromhout, Hans [1 ]
Smid, Tjabe [2 ,4 ]
Vermeulen, Roe C. H. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, IRAS, Div Environm Epidemiol, NL-3584 CM Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] KLM Hlth Serv, Schiphol, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
关键词
Electromagnetic fields; RF-EMF; Exposure assessment; Model; Mobile phone base station; AIR-POLLUTION; TIME SPENT; EMF;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2015.06.029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background: Epidemiological studies on the potential health effects of RF-EMF from mobile phone base stations require efficient and accurate exposure assessment methods. Previous studies have demonstrated that the 3D geospatial model NISMap is able to rank locations by indoor and outdoor RF-EMF exposure levels. This study extends on previous work by evaluating the suitability of using NISMap to estimate indoor RF-EMF exposure levels at home as a proxy for personal exposure to RF-EMF from mobile phone base stations. Methods: For 93 individuals in the Netherlands we measured personal exposure to RF-EMF from mobile phone base stations during a 24 h period using an EME-SPY 121 exposimeter. Each individual kept a diary from which we extracted the time spent at home and in the bedroom. We used NISMap to model exposure at the home address of the participant (at bedroom height). We then compared model predictions with measurements for the 24 h period, when at home, and in the bedroom by the Spearman correlation coefficient (r(sp)) and by calculating specificity and sensitivity using the 90th percentile of the exposure distribution as a cutpoint for high exposure. Results: We found a low to moderate rsp of 0.36 for the 24 h period, 0.51 for measurements at home, and 0.41 for measurements in the bedroom. The specificity was high (0.9) but with a low sensitivity (0.3). Discussion: These results indicate that a meaningful ranking of personal RF-EMF can be achieved, even though the correlation between model predictions and 24 h personal RF-EMF measurements is lower than with at home measurements. However, the use of at home RF-EMF field predictions from mobile phone base stations in epidemiological studies leads to significant exposure misclassification that will result in a loss of statistical power to detect health effects. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 226
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, PROP DAT PRED METH P
  • [2] Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures
    Armstrong, BG
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 55 (10) : 651 - 656
  • [3] Modelling indoor electromagnetic fields (EMF) from mobile phone base stations for epidemiological studies
    Beekhuizen, J.
    Vermeulen, R.
    van Eijsden, M.
    van Strien, R.
    Buergi, A.
    Loomans, E.
    Guxens, M.
    Kromhout, H.
    Huss, A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 67 : 22 - 26
  • [4] Geospatial modelling of electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations
    Beekhuizen, J.
    Vermeulen, R.
    Kromhout, H.
    Buergi, A.
    Huss, A.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 445 : 202 - 209
  • [5] Impact of input data uncertainty on environmental exposure assessment models: A case study for electromagnetic field modelling from mobile phone base stations
    Beekhuizen, Johan
    Heuvelink, Gerard B. M.
    Huss, Anke
    Buergi, Alfred
    Kromhout, Hans
    Vermeulen, Roe
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2014, 135 : 148 - 155
  • [6] What input data are needed to accurately model electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations?
    Beekhuizen, Johan
    Kromhout, Hans
    Buergi, Alfred
    Huss, Anke
    Vermeulen, Roel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 53 - 57
  • [7] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [8] Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany
    Blettner, M.
    Schlehofer, B.
    Breckenkamp, J.
    Kowall, B.
    Schmiedel, S.
    Reis, U.
    Potthoff, P.
    Schuz, J.
    Berg-Beckhoff, G.
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2009, 66 (02) : 118 - 123
  • [9] Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in the Netherlands: Exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area
    Bolte, John F. B.
    Eikelboom, Tessa
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 48 : 133 - 142
  • [10] Calibration and Uncertainties in Personal Exposure Measurements of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
    Bolte, John F. B.
    van der Zande, Gerard
    Kamer, Jos
    [J]. BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2011, 32 (08) : 652 - 663