The cost-utility of high dose oral mesalazine for moderately active ulcerative colitis

被引:25
作者
Buckland, A. [3 ]
Bodger, K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Aintree NHS Fdn Trust, Ctr Digest Dis, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Clin Sci, Div Gastroenterol, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[3] Abacus Int, Bicester, Oxon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03856.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Mesalazine (mesalamine) is standard first line treatment for moderately active ulcerative colitis (UC). Recently, doubling the mesalazine dose (Asacol 4.8 g/day) was shown to improve efficacy with no increase in adverse events. The cost-effectiveness of this strategy remains unknown. To assess the cost-utility of high dose (HD) mesalazine (Asacol 4.8 g/day) compared with standard dose (SD) mesalazine (Asacol 2.4 g/day) as first line treatment for moderately active UC. The costs and benefits associated with a treatment pathway beginning with HD or SD mesalazine were determined over 12 weeks using a decision tree analytical model. A 12-week treatment pathway starting with HD mesalazine cost an average of 2382 pound per patient compared with 2474 pound for SD mesalazine and generated 0.0016 more quality adjusted life years (QALYs). HD mesalazine dominated SD mesalazine, being both more effective and less costly. HD mesalazine treatment resulted in fewer patients requiring surgery or hospitalization for intensive pharmacological treatment. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 72% chance that HD mesalazine was cost effective, based on a cost/QALY threshold of 30 pound 000. This study suggests that HD mesalazine represents a cost-effective alternative to SD mesalazine for moderately active UC, while potentially reducing the need for hospitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1296
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Cost of illness of inflammatory bowel disease in the UK: a single centre retrospective study [J].
Bassi, A ;
Dodd, S ;
Williamson, P ;
Bodger, K .
GUT, 2004, 53 (10) :1471-1478
[2]   How effective are the usual treatments for ulcerative colitis? [J].
Bebb, JR ;
Scott, BB .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 20 (02) :143-149
[3]   Probabilistic analysis of cost-effectiveness models: Choosing between treatment strategies for gastroesophageal reflux disease [J].
Briggs, AH ;
Goeree, R ;
Blackhouse, G ;
O'Brien, BJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2002, 22 (04) :290-308
[4]   Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models [J].
Briggs, AH .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (05) :479-500
[5]   Ciclosporin use in acute ulcerative colitis: a long-term experience [J].
Campbell, S ;
Travis, S ;
Jewell, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 17 (01) :79-84
[6]   Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults [J].
Carter, MJ ;
Lobo, AJ ;
Travis, SPL .
GUT, 2004, 53 :v1-v16
[7]   Impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with inflammatory bowel disease:: A Spanish multicenter study [J].
Casellas, F ;
Arenas, JI ;
Baudet, JS ;
Fábregas, S ;
García, N ;
Gelabert, J ;
Medina, C ;
Ochotorena, I ;
Papo, M ;
Rodrigo, L ;
Malagelada, JR .
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES, 2005, 11 (05) :488-496
[8]  
DHAENS G, 2005, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V128, P1805
[9]   Regular review - Ulcerative colitis [J].
Ghosh, S ;
Shand, A ;
Ferguson, A .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7242) :1119-1123
[10]   Review article: high-dose aminosalicylates to induce and maintain remissions in ulcerative colitis [J].
Hanauer, S. B. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 24 :37-40