Can ENCODE tell us how much junk DNA we carry in our genome?

被引:76
作者
Niu, Deng-Ke [1 ]
Jiang, Li
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, MOE Key Lab Biodivers Sci & Ecol Engn, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ENCODE; Biochemical activity; Repressive transcription; Conservation; Knockout; C-VALUE PARADOX; GENE-EXPRESSION; MESSENGER-RNA; QUALITY-CONTROL; INTRONS; TRANSCRIPTION; METHYLATION; SELECTION; ELEMENTS; CELLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.074
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
One of the large, unsolved problems in human genetics is the proportion of functional sequences in genomes. Recently, the encyclopedia of DNA elements consortium revealed that the majority of the genome is biochemically active, which were described as biochemical functions. This has been used as evidence to pronounce the death of the junk DNA concept. In evolutionary biology, junk DNAs are sequences whose gain or loss does not seriously affect fitness of the host organism. In the human genome, a large amount of biochemical activity should be to repress the sequences so as to avoid their harmful expression. The biochemical activity is very different from functionality in the light of evolution. The single nucleotide polymorphism sites associated with disease and other phenotypes may be functional, but their abundance in the active genome regions is not reliable evidence of functionality. Because of sequence-independent functions, the proportion of functional regions would be underestimated when sequence constraints are used alone. Knockout may be the most effective means of distinguishing functional sequences from junk DNA. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1340 / 1343
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] How much can the orientation of G's eigenvectors tell us about genetic constraints?
    Berner, Daniel
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2012, 2 (08): : 1834 - 1842
  • [2] Ancestral inference in tumors: How much can we know?
    Zhao, Junsong
    Siegmund, Kimberly D.
    Shibata, Darryl
    Marjoram, Paul
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 359 : 136 - 145
  • [3] What can whole genome expression data tell us about the ecology and evolution of personality?
    Bell, Alison M.
    Aubin-Horth, Nadia
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1560) : 4001 - 4012
  • [4] How Much Can We Trust Causal Interpretations of Fixed-Effects Estimators in the Context of Criminality?
    Bjerk, David
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2009, 25 (04) : 391 - 417
  • [5] How Much Can We Trust Causal Interpretations of Fixed-Effects Estimators in the Context of Criminality?
    David Bjerk
    Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2009, 25 : 391 - 417
  • [6] Genome scan methods against more complex models: when and how much should we trust them?
    de Villemereuil, Pierre
    Frichot, Eric
    Bazin, Eric
    Francois, Olivier
    Gaggiotti, Oscar E.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2014, 23 (08) : 2006 - 2019
  • [7] Insect Cultural Services: How Insects Have Changed Our Lives and How Can We Do Better for Them
    Duffus, Natalie E.
    Christie, Craig R.
    Morimoto, Juliano
    INSECTS, 2021, 12 (05)
  • [8] Autoimmune disease in the epigenetic era: how has epigenetics changed our understanding of disease and how can we expect the field to evolve?
    Jeffries, Matlock A.
    Sawalha, Amr H.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2015, 11 (01) : 45 - 58
  • [9] RISKS FROM LOW DOSE/DOSE RATE RADIATION: WHAT AN UNDERSTANDING OF DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE MECHANISMS CAN TELL US
    Jeggo, Penny A.
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 2009, 97 (05): : 416 - 425
  • [10] Multidrug resistance in chronic myeloid leukaemia: how much can we learn from MDR-CML cell lines?
    Rumjanek, Vivian M.
    Vidal, Raphael S.
    Maia, Raquel C.
    BIOSCIENCE REPORTS, 2013, 33 : 875 - 888