Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: the police-community interaction survey

被引:38
|
作者
Rosenbaum, Dennis [1 ]
Lawrence, Daniel S. [2 ]
Hartnett, Susan M. [1 ]
McDevitt, Jack [3 ]
Posick, Chad [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Criminol Law & Justice, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
[2] Urban Inst, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[3] Northeastern Univ, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Georgia So Univ, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
关键词
Community surveys; Police performance measurement; Police accountability; Police-citizen contacts; Procedural justice; Police legitimacy; Randomized control trial; Victim empathy; NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT; PAST FINDINGS; PERCEPTIONS; TRUST; SATISFACTION; ATTITUDES; COOPERATION; ETHNICITY; SUPPORT; CRIME;
D O I
10.1007/s11292-015-9228-9
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
To introduce and evaluate the Police-Citizen Interaction (PCI) Survey, the electronic survey component of the National Police Research Platform, designed to measure the quality of police-citizen encounters at the local level. Three studies tested the feasibility, validity, and sample representativeness of the PCI Survey. A randomized control trial (RCT) compared the PCI Survey results with the most widely used survey method, the telephone survey. The primary measures were the community member's satisfaction with the contact, judgments of procedural justice during the interaction, police effectiveness, and police legitimacy. The RCT revealed no significant differences between the PCI Survey and the standard telephone survey, thus increasing confidence in the validity of the PCI methodology. The PCI Survey was able to replicate "known group" findings from prior research; capture agency-level differences in public satisfaction; uncover complex interactions of race, type of incident and procedural justice; and show the relative importance of both process and outcome during police-initiated contacts. The PCI Survey approach, utilizing web and voice interactive methods, shows considerable promise as a tool for measuring organizational performance in new ways, focusing on procedural fairness and the quality of police services rather than the reliance on crime statistics. The survey appears to have utility for local jurisdictions, while at the same time providing standard metrics for cross-jurisdictional theory testing and benchmarking. The survey was tested initially with three agencies of different sizes. It will be refined for implementation on a larger scale.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 366
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring procedural justice and legitimacy at the local level: the police–community interaction survey
    Dennis P. Rosenbaum
    Daniel S. Lawrence
    Susan M. Hartnett
    Jack McDevitt
    Chad Posick
    Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2015, 11 : 335 - 366
  • [2] Is the Effect of Procedural Justice on Police Legitimacy Invariant? Testing the Generality of Procedural Justice and Competing Antecedents of Legitimacy
    Wolfe, Scott E.
    Nix, Justin
    Kaminski, Robert
    Rojek, Jeff
    JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (02) : 253 - 282
  • [3] Does Procedural Justice Moderate the Effect of Collective Efficacy on Police Legitimacy?
    Nam, Yongjae
    Melde, Chris
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2024, 49 (04) : 590 - 613
  • [4] Promoting Muslims' cooperation with police in counter-terrorism The interaction between procedural justice, police legitimacy and law legitimacy
    Murphy, Kristina
    Madon, Natasha S.
    Cherney, Adrian
    POLICING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICE STRATEGIES & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 40 (03) : 544 - 559
  • [5] Examining macro-level impacts on procedural justice and police legitimacy
    Gau, Jacinta M.
    Corsaro, Nicholas
    Stewart, Eric A.
    Brunson, Rod K.
    JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2012, 40 (04) : 333 - 343
  • [6] The Police-Community Interaction Survey: measuring police performance in new ways
    Rosenbaum, Dennis P.
    Maskaly, Jon
    Lawrence, Daniel S.
    Escamilla, Justin H.
    Enciso, Georgina
    Christoff, Thomas E.
    Posick, Chad
    POLICING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICE STRATEGIES & MANAGEMENT, 2017, 40 (01) : 112 - 127
  • [7] Promoting police legitimacy among disengaged minority groups: Does procedural justice matter more?
    Madon, Natasha S.
    Murphy, Kristina
    Sargeant, Elise
    CRIMINOLOGY & CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2017, 17 (05) : 624 - 642
  • [8] Procedural justice and police legitimacy: a systematic review of the research evidence
    Mazerolle, Lorraine
    Bennett, Sarah
    Davis, Jacqueline
    Sargeant, Elise
    Manning, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CRIMINOLOGY, 2013, 9 (03) : 245 - 274
  • [9] Does Procedural Justice Reduce the Harmful Effects of Perceived Ineffectiveness on Police Legitimacy?
    Nam, Yongjae
    Wolfe, Scott E.
    Nix, Justin
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN CRIME AND DELINQUENCY, 2024, 61 (01) : 124 - 167
  • [10] Policing terrorism with procedural justice: The role of police legitimacy and law legitimacy
    Cherney, Adrian
    Murphy, Kristina
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2013, 46 (03) : 403 - 421