Large-eddy simulation of the shock turbulence interaction

被引:419
作者
Ducros, F
Ferrand, V
Nicoud, F
Weber, C
Darracq, D
Gacherieu, C
Poinsot, T
机构
[1] CERFACS, Ctr Europeen Rech & Foramt Avancee Calcul Sci, F-31057 Toulouse, France
[2] IMFT, F-31400 Toulouse, France
关键词
large-eddy simulation; numerical viscosity; compressible flow; subgrid-scale model; shock turbulence interaction;
D O I
10.1006/jcph.1999.6238
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The objective of this work is to derive a shock capturing tool able to treat turbulence with minimum dissipation out of the shock for a large-eddy simulation (LES) of the shock/turbulence interaction. The present numerical modeling of the shock/turbulence interaction consists of a second-order finite volume central scheme using a skew-symmetric form, a Jameson's type artificial dissipation, and the filtered structure function model. We focus on two areas to build simulations of increased accuracy: A new sensor for triggering artificial dissipation is developed to perform LES of the shock/turbulence interaction. This sensor is simple, local, and does not require any a priori knowledge of the shock position. It is first tested in freely decaying turbulence for both viscous and inviscid cases and in the inviscid 2D vortex/shock interaction. It is shown that both shock capturing properties and standard LES results in the case of freely decaying turbulence are recovered. Even though this modified sensor limits dissipation away from the shock, it is shown that the dissipation used inside the shock affects turbulence when eddies cross the shock region. This effect can be minimized by (1) refining the mesh in the vicinity of the shock or (2) pre-filtering. The results obtained by mesh refinement are investigated for the inviscid shock/turbulence interaction in terms of Reynolds stresses and kinetic energy variations accross the shock. A priori testing shows that, with the proposed scheme and for all meshs considered, the dominant dissipation acting on kinetic energy is the SGS dissipation away from the shock and both artificial and SGS dissipation in the shock, the former being larger than the latter. (C) 1999 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 549
页数:33
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   SOME NEW ASPECTS OF THE SHOCK-WAVE-BOUNDARY-LAYER INTERACTION IN COMPRESSION-RAMP FLOWS [J].
ANDREOPOULOS, J ;
MUCK, KC .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1987, 180 :405-428
[2]  
AVID E, 1993, MODELLISATION ECOULE
[3]   Comment on "experimental study of a normal shock homogeneous turbulence interaction" - Reply [J].
Barre, S ;
Alem, D ;
Bonnet, JP .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1998, 36 (03) :495-495
[4]  
Comte P., 1996, NEW TOOLS TURBULENCE
[5]  
COMTE P, 1997, ERCOFTAC B, V34, P29
[6]   SIMPLE EULERIAN TIME CORRELATION OF FULL- AND NARROW-BAND VELOCITY SIGNALS IN GRID-GENERATED, ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE [J].
COMTEBELLOT, G ;
CORRSIN, S .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1971, 48 (JUL28) :273-+
[7]   A VERTEX-CENTERED FINITE-VOLUME METHOD WITH SHOCK DETECTION [J].
CRUMPTON, PI ;
SHAW, GJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 1994, 18 (06) :605-625
[8]  
DARRACQ D, 1993, P 19 INT S SCHOCK WA
[9]   UNSTEADINESS OF THE SHOCK-WAVE STRUCTURE IN ATTACHED AND SEPARATED COMPRESSION RAMP FLOWS [J].
DOLLING, DS ;
OR, CT .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 1985, 3 (01) :24-32
[10]  
Ducros F, 1996, J FLUID MECH, V326, P1