PROBABILISTIC ROBUSTNESS ANALYSIS-RISKS, COMPLEXITY, AND ALGORITHMS

被引:5
作者
Chen, Xinjia [1 ]
Zhou, Kemin [1 ]
Aravena, Jorge [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
robustness analysis; risk analysis; randomized algorithms; uncertain system; computational complexity;
D O I
10.1137/060668407
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
It is becoming increasingly apparent that probabilistic approaches can overcome conservatism and computational complexity of the classical worst-case deterministic framework and may lead to designs that are actually safer. In this paper we argue that a comprehensive probabilistic robustness analysis requires a detailed evaluation of the robustness function, and we show that such an evaluation can be performed with essentially any desired accuracy and confidence using algorithms with complexity that is linear in the dimension of the uncertainty space. Moreover, we show that the average memory requirements of such algorithms are absolutely bounded and well within the capabilities of today's computers. In addition to efficiency, our approach permits control over statistical sampling error and the error due to discretization of the uncertainty radius. For a specific level of tolerance of the discretization error, our techniques provide an efficiency improvement upon conventional methods which is inversely proportional to the accuracy level; i.e., our algorithms get better as the demands for accuracy increase.
引用
收藏
页码:2693 / 2723
页数:31
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1968, An introduction to probability theory and its applications
[2]   Worst-case properties of the uniform distribution and randomized algorithms for robustness analysis [J].
Bai, EW ;
Tempo, R ;
Fu, MY .
MATHEMATICS OF CONTROL SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS, 1998, 11 (03) :183-196
[3]   On avoiding vertexization of robustness problems: The approximate feasibility concept [J].
Barmish, BR ;
Shcherbakov, PS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2002, 47 (05) :819-824
[4]  
Barmish BR, 1997, P AMER CONTR CONF, P853, DOI 10.1109/ACC.1997.611925
[5]   The uniform distribution: A rigorous justification for its use in robustness analysis [J].
Barmish, BR ;
Lagoa, CM .
MATHEMATICS OF CONTROL SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS, 1997, 10 (03) :203-222
[6]   Explicit formula for constructing binomial confidence interval with guaranteed coverage probability [J].
Chen, Xinjia ;
Zhou, Kemin ;
Aravena, Jorge L. .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2008, 37 (08) :1173-1180
[7]   Risk analysis in robust control - Making the case for probabilistic robust control [J].
Chen, XJ ;
Aravena, JL ;
Zhou, KM .
ACC: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2005 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2005, :1533-1538
[8]   Fast construction of robustness degradation function [J].
Chen, XJ ;
Zhou, KM ;
Aravena, JL .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2004, 42 (06) :1960-1971
[9]  
Chen XJ, 2003, 42ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, P1926
[10]   A MEASURE OF ASYMPTOTIC EFFICIENCY FOR TESTS OF A HYPOTHESIS BASED ON THE SUM OF OBSERVATIONS [J].
CHERNOFF, H .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1952, 23 (04) :493-507