Effects of mesiodistal inclination of implants on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prostheses

被引:0
作者
Çaglar, A
Aydin, C
Özen, J
Yilmaz, C
Korkmaz, P
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Hekimligi Fak, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Gazi Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Dent Fac, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Dept Prosthodont, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
finite element analysis; fixed partial dentures; implant inclination; implant-supported prostheses; stress distribution;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: Patterns of von Mises stress values surrounding implants supporting fixed prostheses in the posterior edentulous maxilla were evaluated using 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Implants were placed in maxillary bone in 2 different configurations. In the first configuration, implants were placed in the first premolar, second premolar, and second molar regions; in the second configuration, implants were placed in the second premolar and second molar regions, and a mesial cantilever was extended to the space of the first premolar tooth on the superstructure. On the implant placed in the socket of the second molar, 3 different inclinations were used (0, 15, and 30 degrees). Loading was applied in the vertical, oblique, and horizontal axes. Results: Inclination of the implant in the molar region was found to result in increased stress. Significant increase in stress on the implant embedded in the premolar region was also seen in the design with the cantilever as compared to the conventional prosthesis design. Discussion: The stress concentrations observed at the neck of the implant were similar to results reported in the literature. Conclusion: The highest stress value obtained in the study was 194.2 MPa with oblique loading. This value did not exceed the endurance limit of pure titanium, which is 259.9 MPa.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 44
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Finite element analysis of non-axial versus axial loading of oral implants in the mandible of the dog [J].
Barbier, L ;
Vander Sloten, J ;
Krzesinski, G ;
Schepers, E ;
Van Der Perre, G .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 25 (11) :847-858
[2]  
Clelland N L, 1991, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V6, P391
[3]   Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature [J].
Geng, JP ;
Tan, KBC ;
Liu, GR .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2001, 85 (06) :585-598
[4]   Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the facial skeleton on simulated occlusal loading [J].
Gross, MD ;
Arbel, G ;
Hershkovitz, I .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 28 (07) :684-694
[5]  
Gunne J, 1994, Int J Prosthodont, V7, P143
[6]  
Holmes D C, 1997, J Oral Implantol, V23, P104
[7]   Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone [J].
Iplikçioglu, H ;
Akça, K .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2002, 30 (01) :41-46
[8]  
Iplikcioglu Haldun, 2002, J Oral Implantol, V28, P29, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0029:TUOCTF>2.3.CO
[9]  
2
[10]   THE EXCESSIVE LOSS OF BRANEMARK FIXTURES IN TYPE-IV BONE - A 5-YEAR ANALYSIS [J].
JAFFIN, RA ;
BERMAN, CL .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1991, 62 (01) :2-4