End-use analysis of household water by metering: the case study in Korea

被引:19
|
作者
Lee, Doo-Jin [1 ]
Park, No-Suk [1 ]
Jeong, Woochang [2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Water Resources Corp, Korea Inst Water & Environm, Water Res Ctr, Taejon, South Korea
[2] Kyungnam Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Chang Won, South Korea
关键词
component of residential water usage; LPCD (litre per capita day); unit amount used; water metering;
D O I
10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00304.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to estimate the real water use for a person per day by analysing water use trend of respective metered data. To investigate the unit amount used and component ratio of residential water usage in households, 146 households nationwide were selected as representative samples, and each end-use usage was monitored by actual metering from 2002 to 2006. From the results of analysing the acquired data, it was found that the unit amount used in a household was 165.8 litres per capita day (lpcd). Additionally, the unit amount used consisted of six end-uses; toilet water was the greatest, at 25% (38.5 lpcd), laundry water represented 20% (30.8 lpcd), kitchen water was 19% (28.4 lpcd), bathtub water was 16% (24.7 lpcd), washbowl water was 10% (15.4 lpcd) and miscellaneous use of water represented 9% (13.5%). Comparing the unit amount used according to housing type, 141 lpcd was shown in the case of single houses, and 155 and 159 lpcd were derived in the cases of multi-unit houses and apartments, respectively. Moreover, the proportions of the aged (50 and over) among the total number of members in single, multihouse and apartment houses were 68.2, 38.1 and 32.4%, respectively. In addition, comparing the amount used and the component ratio among United Kingdom, United States and Korea, the end-use amount and component ratio in Korea are similar to those in the United States. The total amount of water use in the United Kingdom was less than that in both Korea and the United States.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 464
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A BAYESIAN INTEGRATION OF END-USE METERING AND CONDITIONAL-DEMAND ANALYSIS
    HSIAO, C
    MOUNTAIN, DC
    ILLMAN, KH
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1995, 13 (03) : 315 - 326
  • [2] Challenges in the Use of Smart Metering Systems for Determining Residential End-Use Water Consumption
    Mushar, Siti Hajar Mohd
    Rasmani, Khairul A.
    2017 2ND ISSGBM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (ISSGBM-ICS 2017), 2017, 78 : 65 - 73
  • [3] Smart Metering and Water End-Use Data: Conservation Benefits and Privacy Risks
    Giurco, Damien P.
    White, Stuart B.
    Stewart, Rodney A.
    WATER, 2010, 2 (03) : 461 - 467
  • [4] An enhanced method for automated end-use classification of household water data
    Mazzoni, Filippo
    Blokker, E. J. Mirjam
    Alvisi, Stefano
    Franchini, Marco
    JOURNAL OF HYDROINFORMATICS, 2024, 26 (02) : 408 - 423
  • [5] OPTIMAL-DESIGN IN END-USE METERING EXPERIMENTS
    BARTELS, R
    FIEBIG, DG
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 1995, 39 (3-4) : 305 - 309
  • [6] Metering and modelling residential end-use electricity load curves
    Bartels, R
    Fiebig, DG
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1996, 15 (06) : 415 - 426
  • [7] Integrating end-use metering, building modeling and statistical regressions in the energy analysis of buildings
    Tiedemann, K
    Boundary Elements XXVII: Incorporating Electrical Engineering and Electromagnetics, 2005, 39 : 727 - 737
  • [8] Household willingness to pay for a smart water metering and monitoring system: The case of South Korea
    Koo, A. Mi
    Kim, Ju-Hee
    Yoo, Seung-Hoon
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2022, 79
  • [9] Weather sensitivity in household appliance energy end-use
    Hart, M
    de Dear, R
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2004, 36 (02) : 161 - 174
  • [10] Automated Household Water End-Use Disaggregation through Rule-Based Methodology
    Mazzoni, Filippo
    Alvisi, Stefano
    Franchini, Marco
    Ferraris, Marco
    Kapelan, Zoran
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (06)