The law and the outlaw: is legal prohibition a viable solution to the contract cheating problem?

被引:27
作者
Amigud, Alexander [1 ]
Dawson, Phillip [2 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Study Social Proc, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Deakin Univ, Ctr Res Assessment & Digital Learning, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Contract cheating; academic integrity; social media; Twitter; legal approach; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2019.1612851
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating happens when students commission someone else to do assessed work for them. While it is already illegal in 18 jurisdictions, others are considering making the provision of contract cheating services illegal. To date, legal approaches to addressing contract cheating have faced little scrutiny in the peer reviewed literature. This article outlines some challenges with the legal approach to combating contract cheating. To this end it examines a segment of the contract cheating market to determine if contractors operate in localities where contract cheating services have been made illegal. The results suggest that contractors operate in plain sight, offering services to and from localities where services are prohibited by law. On the basis of the current challenges with enforcement of legal rules, this article recommends some alternative strategies for addressing contract cheating.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 108
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Cheaters on Twitter: an analysis of engagement approaches of contract cheating services [J].
Amigud, Alexander .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (03) :692-705
[2]   246 reasons to cheat: An analysis of students' reasons for seeking to outsource academic work [J].
Amigud, Alexander ;
Lancaster, Thomas .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 134 :98-107
[3]   An integrative review of security and integrity strategies in an academic environment: Current understanding and emerging perspectives [J].
Amigud, Alexander ;
Arnedo-Moreno, Joan ;
Daradoumis, Thanasis ;
Guerrero-Roldan, Ana-Elena .
COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2018, 76 :50-70
[4]  
Amigud A, 2017, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V18, P192
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, TIMES HIGHER ED
[6]   Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students [J].
Bretag, Tracey ;
Harper, Rowena ;
Burton, Michael ;
Ellis, Cath ;
Newton, Philip ;
Rozenberg, Pearl ;
Saddiqui, Sonia ;
van Haeringen, Karen .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (11) :1837-1856
[7]  
Clarke R., 2006, Eliminating the successor to plagiarism
[8]   How Prevalent is Contract Cheating and to What Extent are Students Repeat Offenders? [J].
Curtis G.J. ;
Clare J. .
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2017, 15 (2) :115-124
[9]   Can software improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A pilot study of the Turnitin authorship investigate alpha [J].
Dawson, Phillip ;
Sutherland-Smith, Wendy ;
Ricksen, Mark .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (04) :473-482
[10]   Can training improve marker accuracy at detecting contract cheating? A multi-disciplinary pre-post study [J].
Dawson, Phillip ;
Sutherland-Smith, Wendy .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (05) :715-725