Leveraging Social Media to Promote Evidence-Based Continuing Medical Education

被引:23
作者
Flynn, Simone [1 ]
Hebert, Paul [2 ]
Korenstein, Deborah [3 ]
Ryan, Mark [4 ]
Jordan, William B. [5 ]
Keyhani, Salomeh [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Alliance, Washington, DC USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Richmond, VA USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Family & Social Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[7] San Francisco Virginia, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
INFORMATION; SUPPORT; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0168962
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Importance New dissemination methods are needed to engage physicians in evidence-based continuing medical education (CME). Objective To examine the effectiveness of social media in engaging physicians in non-industry-sponsored CME. Design We tested the effect of different media platforms (e-mail, Facebook, paid Facebook and Twitter), CME topics, and different "hooks" (e.g., Q&A, clinical pearl and best evidence) on driving clicks to a landing site featuring non-industry sponsored CME. We modelled the effects of social media platform, CME topic, and hook using negative binomial regression on clicks to a single landing site. We used clicks to landing site adjusted for exposure and message number to calculate rate ratios. To understand how physicians interact with CME content on social media, we also conducted interviews with 10 physicians. Setting The National Physicians Alliance (NPA) membership. Participants NPA e-mail recipients, Facebook followers and friends, and Twitter followers. Main Outcomes and Measures Clicks to the NPA's CME landing site. Results On average, 4,544 recipients received each message. Messages generated a total of 592 clicks to the landing site, for a rate of 5.4 clicks per 1000 recipients exposed. There were 5.4 clicks from e-mail, 11.9 clicks from Facebook, 5.5 clicks from paid Facebook, and 6.9 clicks from Twitter to the landing site for 1000 physicians exposed to each of 4 selected CME modules. A Facebook post generated 2.3x as many clicks to the landing site as did an e-mail after controlling for participant exposure, hook type and CME topic (p<0.001). Twitter posts (p = 0.13) and paid Facebook posts (p = 0.06) were not statistically different from e-mail in generating clicks to the landing site. Use of different hooks to engage physicians had no impact on clicks to the landing site. Interviews with physicians suggested that social media might not be a preferred vehicle for disseminating CME. Conclusions Social media has a modest impact on driving traffic to evidence-based CME options. Face book had a superior effect on driving physician web traffic to evidence-based CME compared to other social media platforms and email.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), 2014, ANN REPORT
[2]  
[Anonymous], OUTP CAS MAN AD MED
[3]  
[Anonymous], UPD NEWS FEED WHAT I
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, 2015 M R BENCHMARKS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Stata Statistical Software: Release 13
[6]  
[Anonymous], SCREEN HEP C VIR INF
[7]  
E- Prescribing: E for Error?, E PRESCR E ERR
[8]   Social media: A tool to spread information: A case study analysis of Twitter conversation at the Cardiac Society of Australia a New Zealand 61st Annual Scientific Meeting 2013 [J].
Ferguson, Caleb ;
Inglis, Sally C. ;
Newton, Phillip J. ;
Cripps, Peter J. S. ;
Macdonald, Peter S. ;
Davidson, Patricia M. .
COLLEGIAN, 2014, 21 (02) :89-93
[9]  
Field M.J., 2009, Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health eds
[10]  
Fisher RA, 1966, DESIGN EXPT, P82