University students' mobile news consumption activities and evaluative/affective reactions to political news during election campaigns: A diary study

Smartphones have now become routinely used tools for people's everyday life news consumption. This article presents a diary study involving 49 university students in the United States documenting their process of consuming political news via smartphones. Participants reported the information about the news and used 23 pairs of semantic differential scales to evaluate and express their affective reactions to the news. Among 176 political news items submitted, the highest proportion was election news. Significant demographic differences were found in participants' choices of semantic adjectives. Differences were also found in proportions of election and non-election news submitted. A higher proportion of election news was marked as 'light', 'stale', 'shallow', 'worthless', 'dishonest' and 'harmful' than those labelled for non-election news. Findings provide valuable insights into university students' political news mobile consumption activities and their assessment and sentiment surrounding election news and general political news during the 2016 US Presidential election campaign.