A review of the development and use of video image analysis (VIA) for beef carcass evaluation as an alternative to the current EUROP system and other subjective systems

被引:63
作者
Craigie, C. R. [1 ,2 ]
Navajas, E. A. [3 ]
Purchas, R. W. [4 ]
Maltin, C. A. [5 ]
Buenger, L. [1 ]
Hoskin, S. O. [2 ]
Ross, D. W. [1 ]
Morris, S. T. [2 ]
Roehe, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Scottish Agr Coll, Anim & Vet Sci Res Grp, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Massey Univ, Inst Vet Anim & Biomed Sci, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[3] Univ Republica, Fac Vet, Area Mejora Genet, Montevideo, Uruguay
[4] Massey Univ, Inst Food Nutr & Human Hlth, Palmerston North, New Zealand
[5] Qual Meat Scotland, Rural Ctr, Edinburgh EH28 8NZ, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Video image analysis; Beef; Carcass; Grading; Classification; EUROP; yield; YIELD GRADE APPLICATION; RED MEAT YIELD; CLASSIFICATION SCORES; PALATABILITY GROUPS; COMPUTER VISION; SKELETAL SCORES; MUSCLE COLOR; LEAN MEAT; CATTLE; CONFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.05.028
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The current EUROP beef carcass classification scheme is still largely dependent on visually assessed fatness and conformation and its purpose is to provide a common basis for the description of carcasses for use in trade, price reporting and intervention. The meat industry, however, aims for accurately predicted saleable meat yield (SMY%) to which the EUROP carcass classification shows highly variable correlations due in part to the variable distribution of fat throughout the carcass as affected by breed, sex, diet, and the level of fat trimming. Video image analysis (VIA) technology is capable of improving the precision and accuracy of SMY% prediction even for specific carcass joints and simultaneously mimics the visual assessment to comply with EU regulations on carcass classification. This review summarises the development and use of VIA for evaluation of beef carcasses and discusses the advantages and shortfalls of the technology and its application. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 318
页数:12
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
AHDB (Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board) Industry Consulting, 2008, 070801 EPES AHDB IND, P1
[2]  
ALBRECHT E, 1996, FLEISCHWIRTSCHAFT, V76, P95
[3]  
Allen P., 2000, Objective beef carcass classification. A report of a trial of three VIA classification systems
[4]  
[Anonymous], EC COSTS CONSEQUENCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1946, USDA TECHNICAL B
[6]  
[Anonymous], 49 ICOMST
[7]   Double muscling in cattle: A review [J].
Arthur, PF .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1995, 46 (08) :1493-1515
[8]  
Augustini C., 1997, Mitteilungsblatt der Bundesanstalt fuer Fleischforschung, Kulmbach, V36, P117
[9]   RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN NEW-ZEALAND BEEF CONFORMATION CLASSES, CARCASS COMPOSITION, AND MUSCLE DIMENSIONS [J].
BASS, JJ ;
COLOMERROCHER, F ;
JOHNSON, DL .
NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1981, 24 (3-4) :281-284
[10]  
Belk K. E., 2000, ANN RECIPROCAL MEAT, V53, P11