The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research

被引:223
作者
Percie du Sert, Nathalie [1 ]
Hurst, Viki [1 ]
Ahluwalia, Amrita [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Alam, Sabina [5 ]
Avey, Marc T. [6 ]
Baker, Monya [7 ]
Browne, William J. [8 ]
Clark, Alejandra [9 ]
Cuthill, Innes C. [10 ]
Dirnagl, Ulrich [11 ,12 ]
Emerson, Michael [13 ]
Garner, Paul [14 ]
Holgate, Stephen T. [15 ]
Howells, David W. [16 ]
Karp, Natasha A. [17 ]
Lazic, Stanley E. [18 ]
Lidster, Katie [19 ]
MacCallum, Catriona J. [20 ]
Macleod, Malcolm [21 ,22 ]
Pearl, Esther J. [23 ]
Petersen, Ole H. [24 ]
Rawle, Frances [25 ]
Reynolds, Penny [26 ,27 ]
Rooney, Kieron [28 ]
Sena, Emily S. [29 ]
Silberberg, Shai D. [30 ]
Steckler, Thomas [31 ]
Wurbel, Hanno [32 ]
机构
[1] NC3Rs, Expt Design & Reporting, London, England
[2] William Harvey Res Inst, Vasc Pharmacol, London, England
[3] William Harvey Res Inst, London, England
[4] Queen Mary Univ London, Barts Cardiovasc CTU, London, England
[5] Taylor & Francis Grp, Publishing Eth & Integr, London, England
[6] ICF, Hlth Sci Practice, Durham, NC USA
[7] Nature, Opin, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Univ Bristol, Sch Educ, Stat, Bristol, Avon, England
[9] PLOS ONE, Life Sci, Cambridge, England
[10] Univ Bristol, Behav Ecol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, Avon, England
[11] Berlin Inst Hlth, QUEST Ctr Transforming Biomed Res, Berlin, Germany
[12] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Expt Neurol, Berlin, Germany
[13] Imperial Coll London, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, Platelet Pharmacol, London, England
[14] Univ Liverpool Liverpool Sch Trop Med, Ctr Evidence Synth Global Hlth, Dept Clin Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[15] Univ Southampton, Clin & Expt Sci, Southampton, Hants, England
[16] Univ Tasmania, Neurosci & Brain Plast, Tasmanian Sch Med, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[17] AstraZeneca, Data Sci & Quantitat Biol, Discovery Sci, R&D, Cambridge, England
[18] Prioris Ai Inc, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[19] NC3Rs, Anim Welf, London, England
[20] Hindawi Ltd, Open Sci, London, England
[21] Univ Edinburgh, Neurol & Translat Neurosci, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[22] Univ Edinburgh, Res Improvement & Res Integr, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[23] NC3Rs, Expt Design, London, England
[24] Cardiff Univ, Acad Europaea Knowledge Hub, Cardiff, Wales
[25] MRC, Policy Eth & Governance, London, England
[26] Univ Florida, Stat Anesthesiol Res STAR Core, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[27] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[28] Univ Sydney, Discipline Exercise & Sport Sci, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[29] Univ Edinburgh, Ctr Clin Brain Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[30] NINDS, Res Qual, Bldg 36,Rm 4D04, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[31] Janssen Pharmaceut NV, Beerse, Belgium
[32] Univ Bern, Anim Welf, Vet Publ Hlth Inst, Vetsuisse Fac, Bern, Switzerland
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON | 2020年 / 598卷 / 18期
基金
英国国家替代、减少和改良动物研究中心;
关键词
IMPROVING BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH; IN-VIVO EXPERIMENTS; POLICIES; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; DESIGN; CALL;
D O I
10.1113/JP280389
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the 'ARRIVE Essential 10,' which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the 'Recommended Set,' which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:3793 / 3801
页数:9
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines
    Ancker, Jessica S.
    Flanagin, Annette
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2007, 13 (02) : 147 - 157
  • [2] Enhancing reproducibility
    不详
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2013, 10 (05) : 367 - 367
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, INTEL 64 IA 32 ARCHI, V3
  • [4] The Devil Is in the Details: Incomplete Reporting in Preclinical Animal Research
    Avey, Marc T.
    Moher, David
    Sullivan, Katrina J.
    Fergusson, Dean
    Griffin, Gilly
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Hutton, Brian
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Macleod, Malcolm
    Marshall, John
    Mei, Shirley H. J.
    Rudnicki, Michael
    Stewart, Duncan J.
    Turgeon, Aexis F.
    Mclntyre, Lauralyn
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [5] Bate ST, 2014, DESIGN AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139344319
  • [6] Reproducibility in Science Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research
    Begley, C. Glenn
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2015, 116 (01) : 116 - 126
  • [7] Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
    Begley, C. Glenn
    Ellis, Lee M.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 483 (7391) : 531 - 533
  • [8] Registered reports at the European Journal of Neuroscience: consolidating and extending peer-reviewed study pre-registration
    Chambers, Christopher D.
    Forstmann, Birte
    Pruszynski, J. Andrew
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 45 (05) : 627 - 628
  • [9] Experimental design and analysis and their reporting II: updated and simplified guidance for authors and peer reviewers
    Curtis, Michael J.
    Alexander, Steve
    Cirino, Giuseppe
    Docherty, James R.
    George, Christopher H.
    Giembycz, Mark A.
    Hoyer, Daniel
    Insel, Paul A.
    Izzo, Angelo A.
    Ji, Yong
    MacEwan, David J.
    Sobey, Christopher G.
    Stanford, S. Clare
    Teixeira, Mauro M.
    Wonnacott, Sue
    Ahluwalia, Amrita
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 175 (07) : 987 - 993
  • [10] The Experimental Design Assistant
    du Sert, Nathalie Percie
    Bamsey, Ian
    Bate, Simon T.
    Berdoy, Manuel
    Clark, Robin A.
    Cuthill, Innes
    Fry, Derek
    Karp, Natasha A.
    Macleod, Malcolm
    Moon, Lawrence
    Stanford, S. Clare
    Lings, Brian
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2017, 15 (09):