Evaluation of DOCK 6 as a pose generation and database enrichment tool

被引:127
作者
Brozell, Scott R. [2 ,3 ]
Mukherjee, Sudipto [1 ]
Balius, Trent E. [1 ]
Roe, Daniel R. [2 ,3 ]
Case, David A. [2 ,3 ]
Rizzo, Robert C. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, BioMaPS Inst, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Chem & Chem Biol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Inst Chem Biol & Drug Discovery, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Pose identification; Pose rescoring; Docking; Virtual screening; Enrichment; ROC curves; Scoring; Sampling; Rmsd; Symmetry; AUTOMATED MOLECULAR DOCKING; FREE-ENERGIES; MM-PBSA; VALIDATION; ALGORITHMS; STRATEGIES; SOLVATION; SEARCH; OPTIMIZATION; PREDICTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10822-012-9565-y
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In conjunction with the recent American Chemical Society symposium titled "Docking and Scoring: A Review of Docking Programs" the performance of the DOCK6 program was evaluated through (1) pose reproduction and (2) database enrichment calculations on a common set of organizer-specified systems and datasets (ASTEX, DUD, WOMBAT). Representative baseline grid score results averaged over five docking runs yield a relatively high pose identification success rate of 72.5 % (symmetry corrected rmsd) and sampling rate of 91.9 % for the multi site ASTEX set (N = 147) using organizer-supplied structures. Numerous additional docking experiments showed that ligand starting conditions, symmetry, multiple binding sites, clustering, and receptor preparation protocols all affect success. Encouragingly, in some cases, use of more sophisticated scoring and sampling methods yielded results which were comparable (Amber score ligand movable protocol) or exceeded (LMOD score) analogous baseline grid-score results. The analysis highlights the potential benefit and challenges associated with including receptor flexibility and indicates that different scoring functions have system dependent strengths and weaknesses. Enrichment studies with the DUD database prepared using the SB2010 preparation protocol and native ligand pairings yielded individual area under the curve (AUC) values derived from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis ranging from 0.29 (bad enrichment) to 0.96 (good enrichment) with an average value of 0.60 (27/38 have AUC a parts per thousand yen 0.5). Strong early enrichment was also observed in the critically important 1.0-2.0 % region. Somewhat surprisingly, an alternative receptor preparation protocol yielded comparable results. As expected, semi-random pairings yielded poorer enrichments, in particular, for unrelated receptors. Overall, the breadth and number of experiments performed provide a useful snapshot of current capabilities of DOCK6 as well as starting points to guide future development efforts to further improve sampling and scoring.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 773
页数:25
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   DOCK 6: Combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes [J].
Lang, P. Therese ;
Brozell, Scott R. ;
Mukherjee, Sudipto ;
Pettersen, Eric F. ;
Meng, Elaine C. ;
Thomas, Veena ;
Rizzo, Robert C. ;
Case, David A. ;
James, Thomas L. ;
Kuntz, Irwin D. .
RNA, 2009, 15 (06) :1219-1230
[32]   Pairwise GB/SA scoring function for structure-based drug design [J].
Liu, HY ;
Kuntz, ID ;
Zou, XQ .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B, 2004, 108 (17) :5453-5462
[33]   Crystal structures of human factor Xa complexed with potent inhibitors [J].
Maignan, S ;
Guilloteau, JP ;
Pouzieux, S ;
Choi-Sledeski, YM ;
Becker, MR ;
Klein, SI ;
Ewing, WR ;
Pauls, HW ;
Spada, AP ;
Mikol, V .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 43 (17) :3226-3232
[34]   AUTOMATED DOCKING WITH GRID-BASED ENERGY EVALUATION [J].
MENG, EC ;
SHOICHET, BK ;
KUNTZ, ID .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 13 (04) :505-524
[35]   Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5 [J].
Moustakas, Demetri T. ;
Lang, P. Therese ;
Pegg, Scott ;
Pettersen, Eric ;
Kuntz, Irwin D. ;
Brooijmans, Natasja ;
Rizzo, Robert C. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2006, 20 (10-11) :601-619
[36]   Docking Validation Resources: Protein Family and Ligand Flexibility Experiments [J].
Mukherjee, Sudipto ;
Balius, Trent E. ;
Rizzo, Robert C. .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2010, 50 (11) :1986-2000
[37]   ALGORITHMS FOR THE ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSPORTATION PROBLEMS [J].
MUNKRES, J .
JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR INDUSTRIAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1957, 5 (01) :32-38
[38]   Structural basis for inhibition promiscuity of dual specific thrombin and factor Xa blood coagulation inhibitors [J].
Nar, H ;
Bauer, M ;
Schmid, A ;
Stassen, JM ;
Wienen, W ;
Priepke, HWM ;
Kauffmann, IK ;
Ries, UJ ;
Hauel, NH .
STRUCTURE, 2001, 9 (01) :29-37
[39]   Exploring protein native states and large-scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model [J].
Onufriev, A ;
Bashford, D ;
Case, DA .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 55 (02) :383-394
[40]   UCSF chimera - A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis [J].
Pettersen, EF ;
Goddard, TD ;
Huang, CC ;
Couch, GS ;
Greenblatt, DM ;
Meng, EC ;
Ferrin, TE .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2004, 25 (13) :1605-1612