PD and Fuzzy Logic Control for Earthquake Resilient Structures

被引:8
作者
Alvarez, Pedro [1 ]
McElwain, Brittany [2 ]
Thesing, Laura [2 ]
Edalath, Sanooj [2 ]
Kukreti, Anant [2 ]
Cohen, Kelly [2 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Polytech Univ Pomona, Dept Civil Engn, Pomona, CA 91768 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Engn & Appl Sci, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
seismic response; tuned mass dampers; active control; passive control; earthquake resilient structures; fuzzy logic control; ENGINEERING-EDUCATION; DAMPERS; VIBRATION; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1002/cae.20540
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
This research was conducted within the framework of a National Science Foundation sponsored summer Research Experience for Undergraduate (REU) students. This research considers small-scale and mathematical models of simple one-story structures that are subjected to free and base-motion excitations and installed with and without passive damping devices to gain an understanding of their dynamic behavior while reviewing active and semi-active damping means being applied and researched today. Using computer programming and numerical methods, the goal is to understand and counteract catastrophic disasters to structures caused by earthquakes. The research is broken down into a number of MATLAB simulations and experiments in order to understand basic dynamic and control features required to design earthquake resilient buildings. These experiments include free vibration experiments to test for the stiffness of columns for different heights and to test for the natural frequency and damping ratio of a one-story structure under different mass loads. Active PD control was then applied to an experimental system experiencing accelerations attributed to the Northridge 1994, Kobe 1995, El Centro 1940, and Mendocino 1992 earthquakes. Robustness comparisons were made between (1) P control; (2) D control; and (3) PD control for the above earthquake inputs to the shaker. A fuzzy logic controller was developed to effectively control transient vibrations. The uniqueness of this control concept is that the fuzzy control continuously varies the damping characteristics of a semi-active tuned mass damper (TMD). It was concluded that a fuzzy logic based TMD was more effective than a regular passive TMD, by providing half the settling times. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Comput Appl Eng Educ 22: 142-152, 2014
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 152
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Ackayol M. A., 2003, COMPUT APPL ENG EDUC, V12, P126
[2]  
Ahmadi G., 1995, SCI IRAN, V2, P99
[3]  
[Anonymous], LARG DEADL EARTHQ YE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DYNAMICS STRUCTURES
[5]   ENGLTHA: An Educational Tool for Earthquake Nonlinear and General Linear Dynamics [J].
Clarke, Richard P. .
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2011, 19 (01) :97-106
[6]  
Connor JeromeJ., 2002, Introduction to Structural Motion Control, V1st
[7]   Modeling and control of magnetorheological dampers for seismic response reduction [J].
Dyke, SJ ;
Spencer, BF ;
Sain, MK ;
Carlson, JD .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 1996, 5 (05) :565-575
[8]   Webshaker: Live Internet shake-table experiment for education and research [J].
Elgamal, A ;
Fraser, M ;
Zonta, D .
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2005, 13 (01) :99-110
[9]   Java']Java-powered virtual laboratories for earthquake engineering education [J].
Gao, Y ;
Yang, G ;
Spencer, BF ;
Lee, GC .
COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2005, 13 (03) :200-212
[10]   Fuzzy logic control of a non-linear structural system against earthquake induced vibration [J].
Guclu, Rahmi ;
Yazici, Hakan .
JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2007, 13 (11) :1535-1551