Timing of norepinephrine initiation in patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:60
作者
Li, Yuting [1 ]
Li, Hongxiang [1 ]
Zhang, Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Dept Intens Care Unit, Changchun 130021, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Timing; Norepinephrine initiation; Septic shock; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; CAMPAIGN INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES; SEPSIS; FLUID; VASOPRESSIN; RESUSCITATION; MANAGEMENT; PRESSURE; SURVIVAL; DEATH;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-020-03204-x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background The effect of the timing of norepinephrine initiation on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock is uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of early and late start of norepinephrine support on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Methods We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from inception to the 1st of March 2020. We included studies involving adult patients (> 18 years) with septic shock. All authors reported our primary outcome of short-term mortality and clearly comparing early versus late norepinephrine initiation with clinically relevant secondary outcomes (ICU length of stay, time to achieved target mean arterial pressure (>= 65 mmHg), and volume of intravenous fluids within 6 h). Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Five studies including 929 patients were included. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis showed that the short-term mortality of the early group was lower than that of the late group (odds ratio [OR] = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61;P < 0.00001;chi(2) = 3.74;I-2 = 0%). Secondary outcomes demonstrated that the time to achieved target MAP of the early group was shorter than that of the late group (mean difference = - 1.39; 95% CI, - 1.81 to - 0.96;P < 0.00001;chi(2) = 1.03;I-2 = 0%). The volume of intravenous fluids within 6 h of the early group was less than that of the late group (mean difference = - 0.50; 95% CI, - 0.68 to - 0.32;P < 0.00001;chi(2) = 33.76;I-2 = 94%). There was no statistically significant difference in the ICU length of stay between the two groups (mean difference = - 0.11; 95% CI, - 1.27 to 1.05;P = 0.86;chi(2) = 0.85;I-2 = 0%). Conclusions Early initiation of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock was associated with decreased short-term mortality, shorter time to achieved target MAP, and less volume of intravenous fluids within 6 h. There was no significant difference in ICU length of stay between early and late groups. Further large-scale RCTs are still required to confirm these results.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sterling, Sarah A.
    Miller, W. Ryan
    Pryor, Jason
    Puskarich, Michael A.
    Jones, Alan E.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 43 (09) : 1907 - 1915
  • [12] Effect of midodrine on the prognosis of patients with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Q. -F.
    Xing, X. -K.
    Wang, T. -Q.
    Jiang, Z. -X.
    Zhang, G.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (09) : 4211 - 4220
  • [13] Corticosteroids in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gibbison, Ben
    Lopez-Lopez, Jose A.
    Higgins, Julian P. T.
    Miller, Tom
    Angelini, Gianni D.
    Lightman, Stafford L.
    Annane, Djillali
    CRITICAL CARE, 2017, 21
  • [14] Extremely early initiation of vasopressors might not decrease short-term mortality for adults with septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Cheng-Hsin
    Healy, Jack
    Kinteh, Ebrima
    Ma, Cheng-Chin
    Tzeng, Ching-Fang Tiffany
    Chou, Eric H.
    Wu, Chin-Chieh
    Shao, Shih-Chieh
    Chen, Kuan-Fu
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [15] Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yuting
    Guo, Jianxing
    Yang, Hongmei
    Li, Hongxiang
    Shen, Yangyang
    Zhang, Dong
    CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 25 (01)
  • [16] Corticosteroids for Managing Pediatric Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Deng, Jiawen
    Bedri, Nefissa
    Zuo, Qi Kang
    Azab, Maryam
    Chang, Oswin
    Virdi, Riya
    Hung, Jay
    Venugopal, Kaden
    Tahir, Umair
    Heybati, Kiyan
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2025, 44 (01) : 74 - 82
  • [17] Early norepinephrine for patients with septic shock: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
    Rui Shi
    Rayan Braïk
    Xavier Monnet
    Wan-Jie Gu
    Gustavo Ospina-Tascon
    Chairat Permpikul
    Maxime Djebbour
    Alice Soumare
    Vincent Agaleridis
    Christopher Lai
    Critical Care, 29 (1):
  • [18] Is norepinephrine more effective than other vasopressors for septic shock? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    F Zhou
    Z Peng
    W Zhang
    J Bishop
    Q Song
    Critical Care, 17 (Suppl 2):
  • [19] Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis
    Zhou, Fei-Hu
    Song, Qing
    MILITARY MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 1
  • [20] Clinical trials comparing norepinephrine with vasopressin in patients with septic shock: a meta-analysis
    Fei-Hu Zhou
    Qing Song
    Military Medical Research, 1 (1)