Household construction knowledge acquisition in post-disaster shelter training

被引:19
作者
Opdyke, Aaron [1 ]
Javernick-Will, Amy [2 ]
Koschmann, Matthew [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Civil Engn, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Commun, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Shelter; Training; Fuzz-set qualitative comparative analysis; DISASTER; EDUCATION; RECOVERY; INDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.038
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The incorporation of safer building practices into shelter after disasters continues to plague recovery efforts. While limited resources are one potential cause, evidence from case studies suggests that poor adoption of safer construction may stem from a knowledge deficit. Despite these shortcomings, previous research has done little to examine the current state of construction education and training in post-disaster shelter and housing, and there is lacking evidence to support how households acquire new knowledge of construction practice. Examining nineteen shelter projects in the Philippines following Typhoon Haiyan, training methods were categorized using Kolb's experiential learning theory poles. Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was then used to analyze the impact of these methods on community construction knowledge. Findings reveal that households acquired knowledge either through a combination of formal training methods that encompassed reflective observation, active experimentation, and concrete experiences or alternatively through observation of on-site construction activities.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 139
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[31]  
UNISDR (United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction), 2016, HUM COST WEATH REL D
[32]  
United Nations, 2015, National disaster risk reduction framework
[33]   Craft training issues in American industrial and commercial construction [J].
Wang, Yinggang ;
Goodrum, Paul M. ;
Haas, Carl T. ;
Glover, Robert W. .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2008, 134 (10) :795-803