Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometrial Cancer: Systematic Review

被引:59
作者
He, HongYing [1 ]
Zeng, DingYuan [1 ]
Ou, HaiLing [2 ]
Tang, YiZhong [1 ]
Li, JingJing [1 ]
Zhong, Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 4, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Liuzhou 545005, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Tradit Chinese Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pathol, Nanning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Laparoscopic hysterectomy; Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy; Laparotomy; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review; ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA; METAANALYSIS; STATISTICS; SURVIVAL; TRIALS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.005
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Trials were identified by searching the Cochrane Gynecological Cancer Collaborative Review Group Trial Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, the China Biological Medicine Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Whole Article Database, Wan Fang Data, and VIP Information, from January 1991 to May 2012, as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library, issue 5, 2012). We also hand searched unpublished and gray literature, reference lists of identified studies, gynecologic cancer handbooks, and conference abstracts. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic surgery with laparotomy for treatment of all stages of endometrial cancer were selected. Data extraction was performed independently by 2 review authors who assessed study quality and extracted data. The whole articles were assessed for method quality by using the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group method quality criteria. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the 12 statistic, which estimates the percentage of heterogeneity between trials. The outcomes were pooled statistically when no clinical heterogeneity was apparent. For time to event data, hazard ratios were pooled using the generic inverse variance facility of RevMan 5. Random effects models were used for all meta-analyses. The search yielded 9 eligible RCTs (1361 laparotomy and 2255 laparoscopy). There was no significant difference between laparoscopic and laparotomic approaches to endometrial cancer in 3-year overall survival (odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 1.71; p = .77), 3-year disease-free survival (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.80; p = .89), recurrence at 3-year follow-up (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.06; p = .74), and pelvic node yield (mean difference [MD, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.32; p = .30). The benefits of laparoscopic surgery vs laparotomy were shorter length of hospital stay (MD, 3.42; 95% CI, 3.81 to 3.03; p < .01), and lower rates of postoperative complications (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.73; p < .01). Disadvantages were higher rates of intraoperative complications (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.74; p = .02) and longer duration of surgical procedures (MD, 32.73; 95% CI, 16.34 to 49.13; p < .01). We conclude that, compared with laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery seems to be beneficial in women with endometrial cancer, in particular insofar as postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. However, more well-designed RCTs are needed to assess the long-term clinical outcomes, in particular the quality of life. (C) 2013 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 423
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endometrial Cancer After Endometrial Ablation: Systematic Review of Medical Literature
    AlHilli, Mariam M.
    Hopkins, Matthew R.
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (03) : 393 - 400
  • [22] Role of laparoscopic hysterectomy in cervical and endometrial cancer: a narrative review
    Gitas, Georgios
    Pados, George
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Guenther, Veronika
    Ackermann, Johannes
    Alkatout, Ibrahim
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 32 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [23] Lymphoceles, Lymphorrhea, and Lymphedema after Laparoscopic and Open Endometrial Cancer Staging
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Uccella, Stefano
    Cromi, Antonella
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Robba, Claudio
    Serati, Maurizio
    Bolis, Pierfrancesco
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (01) : 259 - 267
  • [24] Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
    Nezhat, Farr R.
    Apostol, Radu
    Vega, Mario
    Sirota, Ido
    Vetere, Patrick F.
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2019, 35 (06) : 350 - 355
  • [25] Laparoscopic surgery for low, intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer
    Vardar, Mehmet Ali
    Gulec, Umran Kucukgoz
    Guzel, Ahmet Baris
    Gumurdulu, Derya
    Khatib, Ghanim
    Seydaoglu, Gulsah
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30 (02)
  • [26] Systematic review on socioeconomic deprivation and survival in endometrial cancer
    Donkers, H.
    Bekkers, R.
    Massuger, L.
    Galaal, K.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (09) : 1013 - 1022
  • [27] Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Comparison of Patient Outcomes
    Leiserowitz, Gary S.
    Xing, Guibo
    Parikh-Patel, Arti
    Cress, Rosemary
    Abidi, Alireza
    Rodriguez, Anne O.
    Dalrymple, John L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2009, 19 (08) : 1370 - 1376
  • [28] Endometrial cancer after endometrial ablation: a systematic review
    Oderkerk, Tamara J.
    van de Kar, Mileen R. D.
    Cornel, Karlijn M. C.
    Bongers, Marlies Y.
    Geomini, Peggy M. A. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 (12) : 1555 - 1560
  • [29] Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Endometrial Cancer: a Systematic Review
    Arslanca, Tufan
    Arslanca, S. Banu
    Dursun, Polat
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 9 (02) : 45 - 50
  • [30] Laparoscopic surgery is a current tide of widely accepted standard procedure for endometrial cancer
    Suh, Dong Hoon
    Kim, Jae Weon
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 21 (02) : 67 - 69