Usability testing of EirV3a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Krogstad, Hilde [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sundt-Hansen, Stine Marie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen [5 ,6 ]
Hagensen, Liv Agot [7 ]
Kaasa, Stein [5 ,6 ,8 ]
Loge, Jon Havard [5 ,6 ,9 ]
Raj, Sunil X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Steinsbekk, Aslak [10 ]
Sand, Kari [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Dept Clin & Mol Med,NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Canc Clin, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Med, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[7] Coordinat Unit Orkdal Reg, Orkdal, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[9] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[10] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; PROMs; Usability; Feasibility; Electronic patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SYMPTOM; MULTICENTER; SYSTEMS; HEALTH; PHASE; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4435-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeEir version 3 (V3) is an electronic tool for administration of patient-reported outcome measures (Eir-Patient) that immediately presents patient scores on the physician's computer (Eir-Doctor). Perceived usability is an important determinant for successful implementation. The aim of this study was to answer the following research question evaluated at the cancer outpatient clinics, in the patients' home, and at general practitioners' (GPs) offices: What are the number, type, and severity of usability issues evaluated by the patient (Eir-Patient module) and by the physician (Eir-Doctor module)?MethodsA usability evaluation using observations, think-aloud sessions, individual interviews and focus group interviews in cancer patients and their physicians was conducted. Identified usability issues were graded on a severity scale from 1 (irritant) to 4 (unusable).ResultsOverall, 73 Eir registrations were performed by 37 patients, and used by 17 physicians in clinical consultations. All patients were able to complete the Eir-Patient symptom registration. Seventy-two usability issues were identified. None of them were graded as unusable. For the Eir-Patient module, 62% of the identified usability issues was graded as irritant (grade 1), 18% as moderate (grade 2), and 20% as severe (grade 3). For the Eir-Doctor module, 46% of the identified usability issues were graded as irritant, 36% as moderate and 18% as severe.ConclusionsIn the updatedEir version, issues in the severe and moderate categories have been changed, to optimize the usability of using real-time PROMs in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1844
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
    Tenaw Tiruye
    Michael O’Callaghan
    Kim Moretti
    Alex Jay
    Braden Higgs
    Kerry Santoro
    Terry Boyle
    Kerry Ettridge
    Kerri Beckmann
    BMC Urology, 22
  • [42] Equipercentile equating of scores from common patient-reported outcome measures of function in with cancer
    Rothmund, Maria
    Pilz, Micha J.
    Schlosser, Lisa
    Arraras, Juan I.
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Holzner, Bernhard
    van Leeuwen, Marieke
    Petersen, Morten Aa.
    Schmidt, Heike
    Young, Teresa
    Rose, Matthias
    Cella, David
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2024, 165
  • [43] Electronic capturing of patient-reported outcome measures on a touchscreen computer in clinical diabetes practice (the DiaPROM trial): a feasibility study
    Hernar, Ingvild
    Graue, Marit
    Richards, David
    Strandberg, Ragnhild B.
    Nilsen, Roy M.
    Tell, Grethe S.
    Haugstvedt, Anne
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [44] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review
    Maharaj, Ashika D.
    Samoborec, Stella
    Evans, Sue M.
    Zalcberg, John
    Neale, Rachel E.
    Goldstein, David
    Merrett, Neil
    White, Kate
    Croagh, Daniel
    Pilgrim, Charles H. C.
    Evans, Peter
    Knowles, Brett
    Leong, Trevor
    Philip, Jennifer
    Smith, Marty
    Ioannou, Liane
    HPB, 2020, 22 (02) : 187 - 203
  • [45] DENTAL PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES ARE ESSENTIAL FOR EVIDENCE-BASED PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY
    Reissmann, Daniel R.
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2019, 19 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [46] Preliminary Testing of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
    Jackson, Leanne K.
    Deng, Jie
    Ridner, Sheila H.
    Gilbert, Jill
    Dietrich, Mary S.
    Murphy, Barbara A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 33 (04) : 313 - 320
  • [47] Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures
    Niloufar Campbell
    Faraz Ali
    Andrew Y. Finlay
    Sam S. Salek
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1949 - 1961
  • [48] Patient-reported outcome measures and value-based medicine in paediatrics: a timely review
    Tan, Yi
    Siew, Jia
    Thomas, Biju
    Ng, Kee
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 64 (05) : 285 - 293
  • [49] Quality of life, anxiety and depression patient-reported outcome measures in testicular cancer: A systematic review
    Dincer, Amine Nur
    Brunckhorst, Oliver
    Genel, Oktay
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Muneer, Asif
    Ahmed, Kamran
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2021, 30 (09) : 1420 - 1429
  • [50] Evaluating the Usability and Equivalence of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Individuals with a Lower-Limb Amputation
    Maronati, Rachel
    Rigot, Stephanie K.
    Mummidisetty, Chaithanya K.
    Jayaraman, Chandrasekaran
    Hoppe-Ludwig, Shenan
    Jayaraman, Arun
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETICS AND ORTHOTICS, 2024, 36 (03) : 205 - 213