Usability testing of EirV3a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Krogstad, Hilde [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sundt-Hansen, Stine Marie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen [5 ,6 ]
Hagensen, Liv Agot [7 ]
Kaasa, Stein [5 ,6 ,8 ]
Loge, Jon Havard [5 ,6 ,9 ]
Raj, Sunil X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Steinsbekk, Aslak [10 ]
Sand, Kari [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Dept Clin & Mol Med,NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Canc Clin, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Med, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[7] Coordinat Unit Orkdal Reg, Orkdal, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[9] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[10] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; PROMs; Usability; Feasibility; Electronic patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SYMPTOM; MULTICENTER; SYSTEMS; HEALTH; PHASE; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4435-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeEir version 3 (V3) is an electronic tool for administration of patient-reported outcome measures (Eir-Patient) that immediately presents patient scores on the physician's computer (Eir-Doctor). Perceived usability is an important determinant for successful implementation. The aim of this study was to answer the following research question evaluated at the cancer outpatient clinics, in the patients' home, and at general practitioners' (GPs) offices: What are the number, type, and severity of usability issues evaluated by the patient (Eir-Patient module) and by the physician (Eir-Doctor module)?MethodsA usability evaluation using observations, think-aloud sessions, individual interviews and focus group interviews in cancer patients and their physicians was conducted. Identified usability issues were graded on a severity scale from 1 (irritant) to 4 (unusable).ResultsOverall, 73 Eir registrations were performed by 37 patients, and used by 17 physicians in clinical consultations. All patients were able to complete the Eir-Patient symptom registration. Seventy-two usability issues were identified. None of them were graded as unusable. For the Eir-Patient module, 62% of the identified usability issues was graded as irritant (grade 1), 18% as moderate (grade 2), and 20% as severe (grade 3). For the Eir-Doctor module, 46% of the identified usability issues were graded as irritant, 36% as moderate and 18% as severe.ConclusionsIn the updatedEir version, issues in the severe and moderate categories have been changed, to optimize the usability of using real-time PROMs in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1844
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) in colorectal cancer surgery
    Pena, Romina
    Pascual, Marta
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2024, 102 (12): : 669 - 671
  • [32] Head and Neck Cancer: Improving Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Clinical Practice
    Silveira, Augusta
    Monteiro, Eurico
    Sequeira, Teresa
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 19 (11)
  • [33] Evaluating cancer patient-reported outcome measures: Readability and implications for clinical use
    Papadakos, Janet K.
    Charow, Rebecca C.
    Papadakos, Christine J.
    Moody, Lesley J.
    Giuliani, Meredith E.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (08) : 1350 - 1356
  • [34] Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer
    Jennifer Straatman
    Nicole van der Wielen
    Pieter J. Joosten
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Miguel A. Cuesta
    Elise P. Jansma
    Donald L. van der Peet
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2016, 30 : 1920 - 1929
  • [35] Development and Psychometric Testing of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Vulval Disorders (ePAQ-Vulva)
    Gray, Thomas G.
    Alexander, Charlotte
    Jones, Georgina L.
    Tidy, John A.
    Palmer, Julia E.
    Radley, Stephen C.
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2017, 21 (04) : 319 - 326
  • [36] Intelligent Palliative Care Based on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Sandham, Margaret H.
    Hedgecock, Emma A.
    Siegert, Richard J.
    Narayanan, Ajit
    Hocaoglu, Mevhibe B.
    Higginson, Irene J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (05) : 747 - 757
  • [37] Key methodological considerations for usability testing of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems
    Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
    Quality of Life Research, 2020, 29 : 325 - 333
  • [38] Usability of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Older Patients With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of Data from an Observational Single Center Study
    Riedl, David
    Lehmann, Jens
    Rothmund, Maria
    Dejaco, Daniel
    Grote, Vincent
    Fischer, Michael J.
    Rumpold, Gerhard
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Licht, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [39] The Role of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Assessing Smoking Status and Cessation for Patients with Lung Cancer
    Convill, James
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corrine
    Gomes, Fabio
    ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2022, 10 (02) : 481 - 491
  • [40] Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer
    Tiruye, Tenaw
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Moretti, Kim
    Jay, Alex
    Higgs, Braden
    Santoro, Kerry
    Boyle, Terry
    Ettridge, Kerry
    Beckmann, Kerri
    BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)