Usability testing of EirV3a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Krogstad, Hilde [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sundt-Hansen, Stine Marie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen [5 ,6 ]
Hagensen, Liv Agot [7 ]
Kaasa, Stein [5 ,6 ,8 ]
Loge, Jon Havard [5 ,6 ,9 ]
Raj, Sunil X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Steinsbekk, Aslak [10 ]
Sand, Kari [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Dept Clin & Mol Med,NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Canc Clin, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Med, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[7] Coordinat Unit Orkdal Reg, Orkdal, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[9] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[10] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; PROMs; Usability; Feasibility; Electronic patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SYMPTOM; MULTICENTER; SYSTEMS; HEALTH; PHASE; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4435-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeEir version 3 (V3) is an electronic tool for administration of patient-reported outcome measures (Eir-Patient) that immediately presents patient scores on the physician's computer (Eir-Doctor). Perceived usability is an important determinant for successful implementation. The aim of this study was to answer the following research question evaluated at the cancer outpatient clinics, in the patients' home, and at general practitioners' (GPs) offices: What are the number, type, and severity of usability issues evaluated by the patient (Eir-Patient module) and by the physician (Eir-Doctor module)?MethodsA usability evaluation using observations, think-aloud sessions, individual interviews and focus group interviews in cancer patients and their physicians was conducted. Identified usability issues were graded on a severity scale from 1 (irritant) to 4 (unusable).ResultsOverall, 73 Eir registrations were performed by 37 patients, and used by 17 physicians in clinical consultations. All patients were able to complete the Eir-Patient symptom registration. Seventy-two usability issues were identified. None of them were graded as unusable. For the Eir-Patient module, 62% of the identified usability issues was graded as irritant (grade 1), 18% as moderate (grade 2), and 20% as severe (grade 3). For the Eir-Doctor module, 46% of the identified usability issues were graded as irritant, 36% as moderate and 18% as severe.ConclusionsIn the updatedEir version, issues in the severe and moderate categories have been changed, to optimize the usability of using real-time PROMs in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1844
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome system linked to an electronic chemotherapy prescribing and patient management system for patients with cancer
    McMullan, Christel
    Hughes, Sarah E.
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Calvert, Melanie
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (06)
  • [22] Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
    van Egdom, Laurentine S. E.
    Oemrawsingh, Arvind
    Verweij, Lisanne M.
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Klazinga, Niek S.
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (10) : 1197 - 1226
  • [23] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Breast Cancer Surgery: Evidence Review and Tool Adaptation
    Marzban, Sima
    Shokravi, Samin
    Abaei, Sadegh
    Fattahi, Payam
    Karami, Maryam
    Tajari, Faezeh
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [24] Can Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Identify Cancer Patients' Most Bothersome Issues?
    Snyder, Claire F.
    Blackford, Amanda L.
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Detmar, Symone B.
    Carducci, Michael A.
    Brundage, Michael D.
    Wu, Albert W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (09) : 1216 - 1220
  • [25] USABILITY TESTING OF AN ELECTRONIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME SYSTEM FOR SURVIVORS OF CRITICAL ILLNESS
    Cox, Christopher E.
    Wysham, Nicholas G.
    Kamal, Arif H.
    Jones, Derek M.
    Cass, Brian
    Tobin, Maria
    White, Douglas B.
    Kahn, Jeremy M.
    Hough, Catherine L.
    Carson, Shannon S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 25 (04) : 340 - 349
  • [26] Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures
    Campbell, Niloufar
    Ali, Faraz
    Finlay, Andrew Y.
    Salek, Sam S.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1949 - 1961
  • [27] Content validity and legacy patient-reported outcome measures in cancer
    Smith, Adam B.
    Cocks, Kim
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (07) : 1585 - 1586
  • [28] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy
    Kouzy, Ramez
    Jaoude, Joseph Abi
    Lin, Daniel
    Nguyen, Nicholas D.
    El Alam, Molly B.
    Ludmir, Ethan B.
    Taniguchi, Cullen M.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (09) : 1 - 15
  • [29] Development and usability testing of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure (ePROM) system for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease
    Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee
    Kyte, Derek
    Cockwell, Paul
    Marshall, Tom
    Dutton, Mary
    Walmsley-Allen, Natalie
    Auti, Ram
    Calvert, Melanie
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2018, 101 : 120 - 127
  • [30] Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer
    Straatman, Jennifer
    van der Wielen, Nicole
    Joosten, Pieter J.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Cuesta, Miguel A.
    Jansma, Elise P.
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (05): : 1920 - 1929