Usability testing of EirV3a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Krogstad, Hilde [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sundt-Hansen, Stine Marie [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Hjermstad, Marianne Jensen [5 ,6 ]
Hagensen, Liv Agot [7 ]
Kaasa, Stein [5 ,6 ,8 ]
Loge, Jon Havard [5 ,6 ,9 ]
Raj, Sunil X. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Steinsbekk, Aslak [10 ]
Sand, Kari [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Dept Clin & Mol Med,NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Canc Clin, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Trondheim Reg & Univ Hosp, St Olavs Hosp, Dept Med, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Univ Oslo, Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, European Palliat Care Res Ctr PRC, Oslo, Norway
[6] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Oslo, Norway
[7] Coordinat Unit Orkdal Reg, Orkdal, Norway
[8] Oslo Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Oslo, Norway
[9] Univ Oslo, Inst Basic Med Sci, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
[10] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, NTNU, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; PROMs; Usability; Feasibility; Electronic patient-reported outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SYMPTOM; MULTICENTER; SYSTEMS; HEALTH; PHASE; CARE;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-018-4435-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeEir version 3 (V3) is an electronic tool for administration of patient-reported outcome measures (Eir-Patient) that immediately presents patient scores on the physician's computer (Eir-Doctor). Perceived usability is an important determinant for successful implementation. The aim of this study was to answer the following research question evaluated at the cancer outpatient clinics, in the patients' home, and at general practitioners' (GPs) offices: What are the number, type, and severity of usability issues evaluated by the patient (Eir-Patient module) and by the physician (Eir-Doctor module)?MethodsA usability evaluation using observations, think-aloud sessions, individual interviews and focus group interviews in cancer patients and their physicians was conducted. Identified usability issues were graded on a severity scale from 1 (irritant) to 4 (unusable).ResultsOverall, 73 Eir registrations were performed by 37 patients, and used by 17 physicians in clinical consultations. All patients were able to complete the Eir-Patient symptom registration. Seventy-two usability issues were identified. None of them were graded as unusable. For the Eir-Patient module, 62% of the identified usability issues was graded as irritant (grade 1), 18% as moderate (grade 2), and 20% as severe (grade 3). For the Eir-Doctor module, 46% of the identified usability issues were graded as irritant, 36% as moderate and 18% as severe.ConclusionsIn the updatedEir version, issues in the severe and moderate categories have been changed, to optimize the usability of using real-time PROMs in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1844
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Usability testing of EirV3—a computer-based tool for patient-reported outcome measures in cancer
    Hilde Krogstad
    Stine Marie Sundt-Hansen
    Marianne Jensen Hjermstad
    Liv Ågot Hågensen
    Stein Kaasa
    Jon Håvard Loge
    Sunil X. Raj
    Aslak Steinsbekk
    Kari Sand
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019, 27 : 1835 - 1844
  • [2] Understanding patient-reported outcome measures in colorectal cancer
    Besson, Alex
    Deftereos, Irene
    Chan, Steven
    Faragher, Ian G.
    Kinsella, Rita
    Yeung, Justin M. C.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 (10) : 1135 - 1146
  • [3] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Breast Cancer Surgery
    Kim, Minji
    Graziano, Francis D.
    Tadros, Audree B.
    Allen Jr, Robert J.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2024, 12 (05) : 67 - 75
  • [4] Preferences of Individuals With Cancer for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Whisenant, Meagan S.
    Bamidele, Oluwatosin
    Cleeland, Charles
    Williams, Loretta A.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2021, 48 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [5] A review of the barriers to using Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine cancer care
    Hanh Nguyen
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Sundaresan, Puma
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2021, 68 (02) : 186 - 195
  • [6] The Computer-based Health Evaluation Software (CHES): a software for electronic patient-reported outcome monitoring
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Giesinger, Johannes M.
    Pinggera, Jakob
    Zugal, Stefan
    Schoepf, Felix
    Oberguggenberger, Anne S.
    Gamper, Eva M.
    Zabernigg, August
    Weber, Barbara
    Rumpold, Gerhard
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 12
  • [7] Patient-reported outcome measures for cancer caregivers: a systematic review
    Shilling, Valerie
    Matthews, Lucy
    Jenkins, Valerie
    Fallowfield, Lesley
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 (08) : 1859 - 1876
  • [8] Patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: Integration with computerized adaptive testing
    Liang, Minyu
    Ye, Zengjie
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 10 (12)
  • [9] Why focus on patient-reported outcome measures in older colorectal cancer patients?
    Doolin, James W.
    Halpin, Meredith
    Berry, Jonathan L.
    Hshieh, Tammy
    Zerillo, Jessica A.
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (03): : 394 - 401
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review
    Ben Bouazza, Youssef
    Chiairi, Ibrahim
    El Kharbouchi, Ouiam
    De Backer, Lesley
    Vanhoutte, Greetje
    Janssens, Annelies
    Van Meerbeeck, Jan P.
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 113 : 140 - 151